
Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney on Thursday rejected the Bush administration's vision of a decades-long U.S. troop presence in Iraq akin to South Korea and suggested a need for public benchmarks to gauge progress.
''Our objective would not be a Korea-type setting with 25,000–50,000 troops on a near-permanent basis remaining in bases in Iraq,'' the former Massachusetts governor told the Associated Press.
''I think we would hope to turn Iraq security over to their own military and their own security forces, and if presence in the region is important for us, then we have other options that are nearby,'' Romney said.
In a wide-ranging, hour-long interview with AP reporters and editors, Romney said the Bush administration would be wise to publicly disclose some goals for success in Iraq to restore public confidence. Benchmarks that would tip off adversaries, however, should remain private.
''This is a time when it would be helpful for the American people and the people of Iraq to see that we are actually making progress if that's what's happening,'' Romney said.
Helpful measurements could include power-sharing with the Sunnis, division of oil revenues, the status of certain militias, and the numbers and training levels of Iraqi military and security forces, he said.
''If you don't publish any kind of milestone or benchmark,'' Romney said, you leave people thinking ''you're only telling us the things that you wanted to tell us.''
Like his rivals in the Republican field, Romney supports the conflict and President Bush's recent troop buildup but has increased his criticism of how the Administration waged the war and handled the invasion's aftermath.
Most Americans oppose the conflict and disapprove of Bush's job performance. While a majority of Republicans still back the president and the war, their continued support is not guaranteed, and some GOP leaders are growing restless.
The White House last week offered the comparison between Iraq and the Korean War as the Pentagon announced the completion of the troop buildup in Iraq that Bush ordered in January. U.S. forces have helped keep an uneasy peace in South Korea for more than 50 years.
Presidential spokesman Tony Snow says Bush has cited the Korea analogy in looking at the U.S. role in Iraq, and the president has suggested that his successor will inherit the unpopular war, now in its fifth year.
Romney said the comparison sends the wrong message.
''We have communicated to the people in the region and the country that we're not looking to have a permanent presence in Iraq and I don't think we want to communicate that we were just kidding about that,'' he said.
Romney noted that the United States has bases in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Qatar, and said: ''We can have a presence in the region, but I think that at this time we need to exercise care not to communicate to insurgents something that they can use to say, 'Ah-ha! America does intend to be an occupier forever!' ''
Discussing his proposal to increase the military by 100,000 troops, Romney said improving recruitment incentives will achieve that goal and that reviving the draft is unnecessary.
Romney also answered questions:
– On health care: ''This is a topic where I don't think the Republican Party can sit on the sidelines and just say no.'' He boasted about passing universal health care in Massachusetts, but treaded carefully when asked about a national mandate requiring all workers to have health insurance. ''In our evaluation of what worked in our state, the only way it could work...was to make sure that everybody participated in the system,'' he said.
– On Social Security: ''I will not pursue the raising-taxes option,'' but he would not rule out raising the retirement age, cutting benefits, or creating personal accounts.
– On gay rights: ''If there are people...who hate gays, then I'm not their guy,'' said Romney, who acknowledged he previously opposed the military's ban on openly gay service members but now says, ''It's working. I wouldn't change it.''
– On the perception he's a serial flip-flopper: ''In the style of Mark Twain, I would suggest rumors of my changes in position have been greatly exaggerated.''
– On the Senate immigration proposal: ''It's Washington coming together and reaching a great compromise that doesn't work.'' He said the United States must ''replace gradually and humanely people who are here working illegally today with our own citizens and with legal immigrants.''
– On the decisions by top rivals Rudy Giuliani and John McCain to skip Iowa's August straw poll, a traditional test of organizational strength: ''You can't help but think that makes me far more likely to win'' in January's caucuses. (Liz Sidoti, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.