
Police officers pledge "to serve and protect" not just the community but their coworkers as well. Yet LGBT officers have found that not everyone adheres to this oath, reports The Providence [R.I.] Journal .
Problems include fellow officers who would ignore gay officers' calls for backup, who refused to ride with them in the same cruiser, who slandered them at headquarters, and who neglected to consider them for promotion.
"Everyone here has a story," said Det. Michael Carney to an audience of over 150 gay police officers from around the country, the Journal reported. Carney, who won a 1993 discrimination suit against his department in Springfield, Mass., helped found the New England chapter of the Gay Officers Action League. The organization is completing a five-day conference in Providence to discuss issues affecting LGBT officers.
Conference workshops cover such topics as coping with gender identity and sexual orientation, educating straight peers, lobbying for domestic-partner benefits, and coming out on the job.
Carney told the Journal , "We're trying to reach out to the mainstream to make them understand the importance of community policing today and that every department should be molded to their communities—and that includes the gay and lesbian community."
Sgt. Preston P. Horton, a conference participant and officer of the MBTA Transit Police in Boston, explained to the Journal that the goal is not to create special advantages for LGBT officers.
"Gay and lesbian police officers and gay and lesbian people are just looking to be equal," Horton told the paper. "We're not looking for anything special. I just want to come to work, do my job, raise a family with my significant other, and not worry about if we go somewhere I need to bring along a civil union sheet to visit him in a hospital bed. These are just simple, simple issues. It's the pursuit of happiness and being free." (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.