
A growing number of conservative Christians and gay leaders are finding common ground on the issue of "ex-gay" therapy, reports the Los Angeles Times.
Some Christian leaders, including the Reverend R. Albert Mohler Jr., president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, are considering the possible biological basis for homosexuality. Mohler recently shocked many of his constituents by writing that “we should not be surprised” if homosexuality was not a choice but genetically inscribed in our DNA.
Mohler’s opinions, although scandalous by popular conservative Christian standards, seem to reflect the current view of many Americans. A Gallup poll last month found that 42% of adults believe that a person is born gay, up from 13% three decades ago.
This more scientific outlook on homosexuality coincides with many conservative Christians questioning the effectiveness of “ex-gay” therapy. Some are even reaching across the divide, working with gay professionals to develop new approaches for patients with a conflicting sexual orientation and religion.
Michael Bussee, a former "conversion" counselor who left the ministry after falling in love with another man, recently endorsed the work of two conservative Christian college professors who created new suggested guidelines for sexual identity therapy. The therapy, developed by Warren Throckmorton, Ph.D., and Mark Yarhouse, Psy.D., moves away from the idea of “curing” gays, instead promoting ways to manage their sexuality in terms of their religious values, with a life of celibacy at the extreme.
The supporters of these guidelines come from all across the political spectrum, including an evangelical college provost and Robert Spitzer, a psychiatrist who in the 1970s helped remove homosexuality from the American Psychiatric Association’s list of medical disorders.
“For many years, mental health professionals have taken the view that since homosexuality is not a mental disorder, any attempt to change sexual orientation is unwise,” Spitzer told the Los Angeles Times. “But for health care professionals to tell someone they don't have the right to make an effort to bring their actions into harmony with their values is hubris.”
In response to these recent developments, the American Psychological Association created a task force last spring to reconsider the organization’s vague, decade-old policy on sexual orientation therapy. In its place, they hope to find a balance for patients unhappy about their sexual orientation while still ensuring their mental health and dignity. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.