
In the murder trial of three men charged in the death of Michael J. Sandy, a 29-year-old gay man believed to have been targeted by his killers via a gay chat room, New York State supreme court justice Jill Konviser-Levine has questioned whether hate was a motivation, reports The New York Times. The state Hate Crimes Act of 2000 provides lengthier prison sentences for murders committed "in whole or in substantial part because of a belief or perception regarding the race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability, or sexual orientation of a person.”
"Bottom line, is animus an element of the crime?" Konviser-Levine wondered aloud, according to the Times.
Prosecutors and defense lawyers have debated the motivations of John Fox, 20; Ilya Shurov, 21; and Anthony Fortunato, 21, who are accused of leading Sandy to a parking garage in New York City's Sheepshead Bay section last October, beating him, and then chasing him into the street, where he was hit by a car whose driver then fled the scene. He died later in the hospital.
Defense lawyer Gerald J. Di Chirara asked Konviser-Levine to dismiss allegations of a hate crime because he said "the crimes alleged are not crimes of hate but rather crimes of opportunity.” (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.