
Canada's Anglicans are debating whether to allow their churches to bless gay couples at a time when divisions over the Bible and homosexuality are tearing at the world Anglican fellowship.
The Anglican Church of Canada is scheduled to vote in its national meeting Saturday in Winnipeg, Manitoba, whether to allow priests to bless same-sex unions—a step short of performing same-sex marriage, which is legal in Canada. Before that vote, delegates will choose a new leader on Friday from a field of four candidates, including a woman, who could become the first female elected to lead the Canadian church.
The world Anglican Communion is already in an uproar over the U.S. Episcopal Church's 2003 consecration of the first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire.
The Episcopal Church is the Anglican body in the United States. Anglican leaders have given the U.S. denomination until September 30 to unequivocally pledge not to consecrate another openly gay bishop or authorize official prayers for same-sex couples. If Episcopalians fail to agree to the demands, they risk losing their full membership in the communion.
Separately, the Anglican Church of Canada came under fire in 2002, after Bishop Michael Ingham of the Diocese of New Westminster in British Columbia allowed parishes in his region to bless gay couples. In 2004, the Diocese of Niagara voted to follow suit, but its bishop has banned the ceremonies for now.
In his opening presidential address last Sunday, the outgoing leader of the Anglican Church of Canada, Archbishop Andrew Hutchison, said debate over full acceptance of same-sex relationships is ''one of the most difficult items for our discernment.''
Hutchison said this week's vote raises deeper questions about how to preserve ties between Canadian Anglicans and Anglican provinces overseas, all of which trace their roots back hundreds of years to the Church of England.
Most of the world's Anglicans are theological conservatives who believe gay relationships violate Scripture. More liberal Anglicans emphasize social justice teachings in the Bible, leading them to support full acceptance of same-sex couples.
''We recognize we're at a crossroads for the church,'' said the Reverend Canon Charlie Masters, head of the conservative Canadian group Anglican Essentials. ''But the way to help this is to align ourselves with what the Bible says, not what society says.''
Chris Ambidge, who leads the Toronto chapter of Integrity Canada, an Anglican gay advocacy group, argued that gays have been allowed to marry in Canada for four years ''and the sun has come up bang on time every morning since then.''
''Canadians as a whole are prepared to live with it. Why can't the Anglican church?'' Ambidge said. ''We need to progress if we're going to remain relevant.''
Hutchison is retiring as head of the 1.3 million–member Canadian church, since its leaders, called primates, serve until age 70.
The nominees for Canadian archbishop are Ontario bishop George Bruce; Huron bishop Bruce Howe; Bishop Fred Hiltz of Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island, and Edmonton bishop Victoria Matthews, who was a nominee in the 2004 election but withdrew when she was diagnosed with breast cancer.
If Matthews wins, she will be the second woman elected to lead a national Anglican church in the nearly 500-year-old Anglican Communion. Last year, U.S. Episcopal presiding bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori became the first woman elected to head an Anglican province. (Charmaine Noronha, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.