

Political operatives are in motion sifting through opponents’ latest financial filings in the presidential race, as The Washington Post reported Tuesday. One point of interest for LGBT voters is that former Grey’s Anatomy star Isaiah Washington, a lightning rod lately for gay criticism, gave $2,300 to Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign.
The donation came on May 4 and is the maximum amount an individual can give to a presidential candidate per election. Washington used a homophobic slur against Grey's costar T.R. Knight last year, then repeated the word at this year's Golden Globe Awards in January; he later apologized on Larry King Live, and his contract was not renewed on Grey's Anatomy.
Obama now faces the classic "Should he or shouldn’t he return the money?" question asked of candidates who receive funds from donors that some observers find objectionable. Kenneth Sherrill, professor of political science at Hunter College, says the Washington case is par for the course.
“Virtually every candidate gets money from people who are controversial. This is an exercise of free speech on Washington’s part,” said Sherrill, noting that Washington should be able to participate in the political process. “Under current American constitutional law, he’s got a right to give his money to a candidate. The difference here is, it’s public; we know who he gave money to.”
All three Democratic front-runners have faced check-rejection dilemmas in the past and likely will again. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, Obama’s campaign gave back $37,000 to Wilmette, Ill., businessman Tony Rezko, who is fighting public corruption and business fraud charges.
During Hillary Clinton’s Senate reelection campaign in 2005, the senator returned $5,000 to the political action committee of Wal-Mart Stores Inc., after serving on the company’s board from 1986 to 1992. She believed that the company should provide better worker benefits, according to the Associated Press.
John Edwards returned $10,000 to employees of a Little Rock, Ark., law firm during his 2004 presidential bid after one of the firm's clerks said she expected her boss to reimburse her for her $2,000 donation, according to the San Jose Mercury News.
Obama campaign officials declined to comment about whether they would return Washington's donation, instead forwarding the following statement to The Advocate: "Barack Obama strongly disagrees with the statements made by Isaiah Washington last year, but he joins members of the GLBT community in encouraging [Washington’s] efforts to seek counseling and his decision to tape a public service announcement on behalf of GLAAD."
Washington made
the PSA, in which he decried hate speech, as part of
his effort to make amends for using the slur against Knight.
It began airing in May.
The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against
Defamation declined to comment on Washington's
contribution to Obama. (Padraic Wheeler, The
Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.