
New Jersey governor Jon S. Corzine sent a letter Friday to the United Parcel Service of America—UPS—asking the shipping conglomerate to recognize the state's civil unions law and offer gay employees benefits for their partners similar to those of married workers.
The company has been targeted by gay rights activists, who assert that partnered gay employees are not being treated the same as their married coworkers regardless of state laws that requires employers to do so.
UPS argues that the New Jersey law does not change company policy, which is governed by federal law.
Corzine said the company should consider extending benefits anyway.
“Surely, as a company with a long-standing commitment to its employees and the community, UPS would not want to make its employees and their families face these difficult choices based on the subtleties of the interaction of federal and state law," Corzine wrote.
The LGBT advocacy group Lambda Legal initiated the bid to try to force UPS to provide partner's benefits for its gay employees. Lambda Legal senior staff attorney David Buckel told CBS that he appreciates the governor’s letter of support.
“It’s quite a governor who reaches out to help a couple families like this,” he said to CBS. “We don’t know if we’ll get a letter from the governor for each family and each company.”
Steven Goldstein, chairman of the LGBT rights group Garden State Equality, told the Associated Press that the UPS situation is not an isolated incident.
“When you have hundreds of companies in New Jersey refusing to respect this law, there’s something wrong with the law itself,” Goldstein said to AP.
In February, New Jersey became at the time the third state to recognize civil unions for same-sex couples. The law was a reaction to a state supreme court decision that asked the legislature to extend to gay partners benefits similar to those of married straight couples, including employee health benefits. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.