
Italian gays will hold public ''kiss-ins'' near the Colosseum this week to protest the detention of two men by police for kissing in front of the famous Rome monument, gay rights groups said.
Some lawmakers said they would discuss the incident in parliament, while gay rights groups accused the police of discrimination Saturday.
There were contradictory versions of the events that led to the detention.
Police confirmed the two men were held for about 40 minutes early Friday and released after being reported for committing lewd acts in public—a crime that can carry a sentence of up to two years in jail.
The two were ''not just kissing,'' and the officers would have detained the couple also if it had been a heterosexual one, police official Col. Alessandro Casarsa said.
''They acted because there was a couple that was committing a lewd act in front of one of the most viewed monuments in Italy,'' Casarsa said without elaborating. ''We apply the law to all in the same way, men and women.''
Arcigay, the main Italian gay rights group, hired a lawyer for the couple and identified the men as Roberto L. and Michele M., saying that the two, aged 27 and 28, had only shared a gesture of affection after a night out in the gay bars that line one of the streets near the Colosseum.
''Roberto and Michele were only kissing, all other statements are false,'' the group said in a statement.
Arcigay said it would hold its protest near the Colosseum on Thursday, while another group, the Mario Mieli Club, scheduled a rally of public kissing in front of the 2,000-year-old arena for Sunday night.
Vladimir Luxuria, a Communist politician and Italy's first transvestite lawmaker, was one of the representatives saying she would call on the government to explain the incident in parliament.
''It's worrying that a gesture of affection is considered a crime,'' she told La Repubblica daily. ''It's absurd that two young people who love each other should spend the night in a police station without having done anything obscene.''
While enraged by the detention, gay rights groups hailed as a victory a decision Friday by Italy's highest criminal court recognizing that gay people who migrate clandestinely to Italy should not be sent back to their country if they could face persecution, news reports said.
Italian dailies reported that the Court of Cassation, ruling on the expulsion order for a Senegalese immigrant, did not allow the man to stay but ordered a judge to reexamine his case and verify his claim that he would be persecuted at home. (Ariel David, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.