

With hugs and cheers Sunday, members of Atlanta's oldest Lutheran church celebrated the pastor at the center of a battle over the treatment of gay clergy in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.
The support for the Reverend Bradley Schmeling at St. John's Lutheran Church came a day after the national assembly of the ELCA in Chicago urged bishops to refrain from defrocking gay and lesbian ministers who violate a celibacy rule. The assembly's action fell short of permitting ordained gays churchwide.
Schmeling called the assembly's vote a ''crack in the dam'' and told the more than 100 people gathered in the St. John's sanctuary that the congregation had ''given its gift'' to the ELCA.
''The hard work, the struggle, has really finally made a difference for years to come,'' he said.
Schmeling became a focus of the ELCA's debate over gay clergy when he was removed from the church's clergy roster last year after he told his bishop that he was in a relationship with a man.
A disciplinary committee decided it had no choice but to defrock Schmeling and order him out of the pulpit due to a policy that excludes gay, bisexual, and transgender people in relationships from the ordained ministry.
However, the committee also suggested that the church consider reinstating gay clergy forced to step down because of their relationships. And it concluded that, aside from his relationship, Schmeling had proved he is worthy of his title.
After Saturday's vote he will continue to be pastor at St. John's at the request of the congregation, although his name will stay off the clergy list.
Schmeling said the removal of his name from the clergy roster will present problems only if he seeks a job with another congregation—and he said he has no plans to leave St. John's.
''On a day-to-day basis, nothing changes here,'' he said.
Bishop Ronald B. Warren, head of the ELCA's Southeastern Synod, has said he plans to take no further action against St. John's or Schmeling.
Like other mainline Protestant groups, the ELCA has been struggling to reconcile differences on the issue.
The assembly's 538–431 vote followed an emotional debate on how the denomination should interpret what the Bible says about homosexuality. It decided to postpone a more concrete decision on gay clergy for two years until a task force nearing the end of an eight-year study on human sexuality releases its findings.
St. John's members said although the assembly vote was disappointing, they hope it is a small step forward.
''I felt real pain and rejection of us and what we've been fighting for, for years,'' said Barbara Arne, who headed the committee that hired Schmeling in 2000. ''But I'm really hopeful pastors and congregations will be at less risk for going through what Pastor Brad and all of us have.'' (Dorie Turner, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.