
Gay and lesbian staff members at Oxford, Ohio–based Miami University can keep their domestic-partner benefits, following Monday's affirmation by the Ohio court of appeals of a lower court ruling.
Conservative lawmaker Thomas Brinkman, with legal counsel from the antigay Alliance Defense Fund, brought the case to the Ohio courts in November 2005. A year later, the suit was dismissed, but Brinkman and the Alliance Defense Fund filed a notice of appeal.
Lambda Legal acted on behalf of professors Jean Lynch and Yvonne Keller, whose families stood to lose their medical coverage if Brinkman won the case.
The court unanimously concluded that "Brinkman's status as an Ohio taxpayer does not give him standing to challenge the university's policy of providing health insurance benefits to same-sex domestic partners of its employees."
Brinkman's original argument was that the university's domestic-partner benefits violated the state's constitutional amendment limiting marriage to a heterosexual couple. Lambda Legal argued that the amendment does not apply to the university because it concerns only marriage and also because the domestic-partner benefits were provided through donated funds.
"Lesbian and gay employees and their families' health were at stake, and today the court has granted them freedom from being a pawn in politically motivated lawsuits," James P. Madigan, a Lambda Legal staff attorney, said in a statement. "The court has affirmed that Mr. Brinkman's daily life is unaffected when the domestic partners of lesbian and gay university employees have health insurance and he therefore has no standing to bring a lawsuit." (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.