

Gay and lesbian couples in Iowa should have the right to marry despite a statute banning same-sex marriage, a district court judge ruled Thursday. Judge Robert Hanson said a 1998 statute defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman violates the equal protection and due process clauses of Iowa's constitution.
"Couples, such as plaintiffs, who are otherwise qualified to marry one another may not be denied licenses to marry or certificates of marriage or in any other way prevented from entering into a civil marriage…by reason of the fact that both persons comprising such a couple are of the same sex," he wrote in a 63-page decision.
Camilla Taylor and Kenneth Upton Jr., senior staff attorneys with Lambda Legal, argued for the plaintiffs alongside Dennis Johnson, a Des Moines attorney.
"I think it shows that every state in the country can offer fair treatment," Taylor told The Advocate on Thursday. "Even in the heartland—especially in the heartland."
The ruling stems from Varnum v. Brien, filed in December 2005 by six long-term couples—some with children—who were denied marriage licenses by Polk County recorder Tim Brien. The couples sought the status of marriage to protect their families. According to Lambda Legal, which is representing the couples, the words husband, wife, spouse, or some form of the words marriage or marry appear in more than 540 sections of the state’s laws, which exclude same-sex couples from many of the same rights as heterosexual couples.
Rachel Cunningham, a spokeswoman for the conservative Iowa Family Policy Center, told the Chicago Tribune that Thursday's decision will be appealed. "We're very disappointed and will pursue to the next level of courts," she said.
Taylor said that the decision will hold up in the higher courts because Iowa has a track record of supporting equal treatment and due process under the law.
"Iowa has a long tradition of doing the right thing," she said. "Over time, Iowa has provided fair treatment of all sorts of individuals. For instance, they allowed women to become lawyers before a lot of [neighboring states] allowed them to."
The state currently permits gay and lesbian individuals to adopt children, and some jurisdictions in the state allow same-sex partners to adopt their partner's child, according to the Human Rights Campaign.
In April 2006, 26 conservative Iowan legislators attempted to halt Varnum. The Alliance Defense Fund, on behalf of the legislators, argued that the statute defined marriage only for heterosexual couples. That August a judge denied their application, stating that the legislators' interests in the case were insufficient for intervention. (Michelle Garcia, The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.