

A senior Republican senator is considering resigning, party officials said Friday, after days of public and private pressure stemming from his arrest in June in a police undercover operation at an airport men's room.
Sen. Larry Craig pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct on August 1, and while he has since said he did nothing wrong, the episode has roiled the Republican Party and produced numerous calls for him to step down.
Republicans lost control of Congress in last November's elections, partly due to scandals, and are trying to regroup in preparation for the next round of voting, this time with the presidency at stake, in late 2008. Many conservatives, a significant base in the party, oppose gay rights.
As a measure of the pressure Craig faces, party officials said a statement had been drafted at Republican Party headquarters calling for the third-term senator to resign. It was not issued, these officials said, in response to concerns that it might complicate quiet efforts under way to persuade the 62-year-old lawmaker to give up his seat.
Any resignation would clear the way for C.L. ''Butch'' Otter, the Republican governor of the conservative western state of Idaho that Craig represents, to name a replacement who would serve until the end of Craig's current term in 2009. This would maintain the current balance between Republicans and Democrats in the Senate, according to party officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly. Democrats control the Senate 51–49 including two independents who usually vote with them.
Craig has not made any public statements about his case since an appearance earlier this week in Boise, in which he said he had done nothing wrong. ''I am not gay. I never have been gay,'' he added emphatically.
He said any additional comment would be posted on his official Web site, where the only reference to the incident as of Friday morning was a text of the statement he read before the television cameras.
Craig, 62, served in the House before winning his first Senate term in 1990 and compiled a strongly conservative voting record.
He was arrested on June 11 by an undercover police officer in a Minneapolis airport men's room who said the senator had engaged in conduct ''often used by persons communicating a desire to engage in sexual conduct.''
Minutes after he was arrested for lewd conduct, Craig denied soliciting for sex, saying ''I'm not gay. I don't do these kinds of things,'' according to an audio tape released by police on Thursday.
He denied that he had used foot and hand gestures to signal interest in a sexual encounter. The officer, Sgt. Dave Karsnia, accused the three-term senator of lying and grew exasperated with his denials.
''Embarrassing, embarrassing. No wonder why we're going down the tubes,'' Karsnia said.
In the police interview, Craig, 62, never admitted doing anything wrong and said his actions had been misinterpreted. However, Karsnia wrote in his report that the gestures were consistent with efforts to find a sexual partner in the men's room.
Craig later pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of disorderly conduct, which he now calls a mistake.
More Republicans distanced themselves from Craig on Thursday. Sen. John Ensign, who chairs the Republicans' senatorial campaign committee, which provides finances and other political necessities to candidates, stopped short of calling on him to resign but suggested strongly that he should.
''I wouldn't put myself, hopefully, in that kind of position, but if I was in a position like that, that's what I would do,'' Ensign told the Associated Press. ''He's going to have to answer that for himself.''
The party's Senate leadership had previously called for the Ethics Committee to investigate and on Wednesday took the highly unusual measure of asking him to give up his seniority in committee positions. Craig complied. (David Espo, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.