
The U.S. House of
Representatives began hearings Wednesday on the
Employment Non-Discrimination Act with a variety of
witnesses, from House members to guest experts,
scheduled to speak.
The federal bill would make it illegal to fire,
refuse to hire, or refuse to promote employees based
on sexual orientation or gender identity. Such
legislation has not been introduced in Congress since 1996.
Currently, protections vary by state. In 31 states it
is legal to fire employees because they are gay; in 39
states employees can be fired for being transgender.
House members Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Tammy
Baldwin (D-Wis.), and Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) will
testify in favor of the bill. Also scheduled to
testify in support were M.V. Lee Badgett, a scholar
affiliated with the Williams Institute at the
University of California, Los Angeles; and University
of Colorado professor Helen Norton, among others; while
Washington attorney Larry Lorber is expected to speak
against the bill.
This would be the first hearing on ENDA, as
the bill is known, since the 1990s. (The
Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.