
Two scholars funded by the "ex-gay" ministry Exodus reported greatly mixed results this week in the most ambitious study yet on whether faith-based therapy can "cure" homosexuality, days after a counselor in another "ex-gay" program was sentenced on felony charges of sexually attacking his male clients.
Christopher Austin, 43, was sentenced in Dallas to 10 years in prison on two counts of felony sexual assault in connection with his work in the "ex-gay" program Renew, operated out of the Church of Christ South MacArthur in Irving, Texas. A judge last week reduced his sentence to seven years' probation, not concurrently, on each charge, a district attorney's spokesman told Gay.com.
One of several victims who came forward, Mark Hufford, testified that Austin used "touch therapy" to ostensibly "cure" him of homosexuality, a treatment that progressed to include nude sessions and even oral sex.
The tale serves as a painful counterpoint to a book published this week by psychologists Stanton Jones of Wheaton College and Mark Yarhouse of Pat Robertson University, who attempted to show the extent to which sexual-orientation change is possible though a study of 98 participants of "ex-gay" ministries over four years.
Their book, Ex-Gays? A Longitudinal Study of Religiously Mediated Change in Sexual Orientation (InterVarsity Press), concludes:
Fifteen percent of participants reported substantially reduced homosexual desire and attraction.
Twenty-three percent experienced satisfactory reductions in homosexual desire and were living chaste lives.
Twenty-nine percent experienced only modest change in the desired direction but expressed commitment to continue changing.
Fifteen percent experienced no change and were conflicted about the future.
Four percent expressed confusion about their identity but did not label themselves gay.
Eight percent reported change in the "undesired" direction.
Twenty-five of the original 98 participants dropped out of the study.
Alan Chambers, president of Exodus International, cheered the findings Monday in a Nashville news conference.
"Finally, there is now scientific evidence to prove what we as former homosexuals have known all along -- that those who struggle with unwanted same-sex attraction can experience freedom from it," Chambers said.
Critics claim Chambers's assertion is, at best, wildly optimistic, given that more than 60% who made it to the fourth year did not significantly change; nearly a quarter were completely celibate, and 8% claimed they were "gayer" after the study.
Even the study's authors appear to call their findings into question.
"Our study examines a representative sample of the population of those in Exodus seeking sexual orientation change…. Most of the individuals who reported that they were heterosexual at Time 3 did not report themselves to be without experience of homosexual arousal…. We believe the individuals who presented themselves as heterosexual success stories at Time 3 are heterosexual in some meaningful but complicated sense of the term," they wrote.
"They say it's representative, admit they can't prove it, but they're confident anyway," Jim Burroway, editor of the LGBT blog BoxTurtleBulletin.com, told Gay.com. Burroway also suggested the high dropout rate is a red flag.
"In most studies which take place over a number of years, dropouts are to be expected, and they usually aren't relevant. But about a quarter of this study's participants dropped out, and we should have a clear understanding of why they dropped out before we write them off as irrelevant," Burroway said.
"Exodus should be embarrassed that even their hand-picked participants in this hoax of a study showed such a meager success rate," Wayne Besen, executive director of Truth Wins Out, told Gay.com.
Resounding success was not the study's point, however, according to Besen: "It was created to suit their political agenda, which is spreading myth that if one person can change, anyone can change.
"And the study also tried to show that there is no harm in ex-gay therapies, when there's plenty of evidence to show that they are harmful," Besen said.
According to Besen, Austin was affiliated with the "ex-gay" National Association For Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), even teaching a seminar at NARTH's 2004 convention titled "Understanding and Treating Compulsive Sexual Behavior in Men with Value-Incongruent Homosexual Issues: A Multidimensional Approach."
Austin lost his counseling license and was ordered to pay a $2,500 fine and to register as a sex offender, the district attorney's office said. (Larry Buhl, Gay.com)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.