

With the Anglican world anxiously waiting, Episcopal leaders meeting in New Orleans weighed their response to demands that they bar any more gay people from becoming bishops.
A bishops' committee took a break late Monday after working on a statement that could determine whether the global Anglican fellowship splits apart.
The Episcopal Church, the Anglican body in the United States, caused an uproar in 2003 by consecrating the first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire.
Anglican leaders set a September 30 deadline for the Americans to pledge unequivocally not to consecrate another gay bishop or approve an official prayer service for same-gender couples.
A vote by the full House of Bishops was set for Tuesday, the final day of the Episcopal meeting.
''We are working very closely with one another whether we are on the conservative end of the church, the liberal, or the moderate middle,'' said liberal Los Angeles bishop Jon Bruno. ''We're looking to make as full, clear, and complete a response as we can.''
Bishop Ed Little, a theological conservative from of northern Indiana who wants to stay in the Episcopal Church, said that lay and clergy leaders from the Anglican Communion who have been attending the six-day meeting are pushing bishops to make concessions.
''They've all said in essence, for the good of the church, for the good of the communion, you have to take a step back,'' Little said.
The 77 million–member communion is a fellowship of churches that trace their roots to the Church of England. It is the third-largest Christian body in the world, behind the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches.
Most overseas Anglicans are traditionalists who believe the Bible bans gay relationships. But liberals, who emphasize biblical teaching on justice and tolerance, are a majority in the 2.2 million–member Episcopal Church.
Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, the Anglican spiritual leader, took the unusual step of attending the meeting on its first two days, warning Episcopal leaders behind closed doors that they must make changes to keep the communion together.
Last year, the top Episcopal policymaking body, the General Convention, asked bishops to ''exercise restraint'' by not approving candidates for bishop ''whose manner of life presents a challenge'' to the church. However, the measure isn't binding, and a lesbian with a female partner is among the finalists in an upcoming election for Chicago bishop.
The Episcopal prayer book has no liturgy for blessing same-gender couples, but about a dozen of the 110 U.S. dioceses allow priests to perform the ceremonies. (Rachel Zoll, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.