
A Los Angeles judge dismissed a lawsuit Tuesday against Mexico City cardinal Norberto Rivera, who had been accused of conspiring with Roman Catholic officials in the United States to transfer a priest accused of sexual abuse between the two countries.
The judge found Rivera could not be held accountable in a U.S. court because there was not enough evidence against him, said Mike Finnegan, the plaintiff's attorney.
''It was a legal technicality,'' he said. ''It didn't reach any of the merits of the case and it didn't get to the key issues in the case, which is Cardinal Rivera's complicity in sending [the priest] to the United States as a child molester.''
Finnegan said he planned to pursue a lawsuit in Mexican courts.
Rivera's spokesman, Hugo Valdemar, told the Associated Press in Mexico City that the cardinal was ''greatly satisfied'' by the judge's ''careful, fair decision.''
''We are happy and satisfied that the judge confirmed what we have always said: This isn't a case to be judged in the United States,'' he said. ''Mr. Joaquin has every right to present a complaint in Mexico.''
Joaquin Aguilar Mendez, 26, filed the lawsuit alleging that Rivera, who was then a bishop in Puebla state, knew that the priest had molested children when he sent him to the archdiocese of Los Angeles. The priest, Nicolas Aguilar Rivera, is no relation to the cardinal.
While it is the Associated Press's policy not to identify people who allege sexual abuse, Mendez chose to come forward with his story.
Rivera has said he was unaware of molestation allegations against the priest.
In a declaration filed in February, the cardinal said he sent a letter to Los Angeles cardinal Roger Mahony in 1987 warning him that Nicolas Aguilar Rivera had ''homosexual problems.'' A spokesman for the Los Angeles archdiocese has said the U.S. cardinal never received the letter.
The priest fled to Mexico after less than a year in Los Angeles after he was accused of sexual abuse in Los Angeles and before police could begin an investigation. He has since been charged in California with 19 felony counts of committing lewd acts on a child.
The priest continued to serve in Mexico. The lawsuit Mendez filed against him about a year ago alleges that he raped the boy at the rectory when he was about 12 years old. The boy was told by the priest to keep quiet or his siblings would suffer the same abuse, according to the lawsuit.
The priest's whereabouts are currently unknown, Finnegan said.
The judge's ruling also dismisses claims against the Mexican diocese of Tehuacan, where the cardinal was bishop at the time he transferred the priest.
Mahony, the Los Angeles cardinal, settled his portion of the lawsuit in July when the archdiocese agreed to pay more than 500 alleged victims of sex abuse $660 million, archdiocese spokesman Tod Tamberg said.
''We maintain that it was a ridiculous charge of conspiracy. The decision doesn't change our opinion that this was an absolutely spurious lawsuit,'' Tamberg said. (Gillian Flaccus, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.