
Members of an antigay church best known across the United States for picketing the funerals of U.S. soldiers say Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson once ''saw eye to eye'' with them on homosexuality. The Westboro Baptist Church is urging Thompson to support its stance.
The church has angered lawmakers in several states by rallying at soldiers' funerals, claiming the deaths are retribution for the United States' acceptance of homosexuality.
Thompson campaign spokeswoman Karen Hanretty on Wednesday dismissed the church as ''a radical fringe group, looking to draw attention to themselves.''
''Their behavior at the funerals of fallen soldiers is disgraceful and reprehensible,'' she said. ''In no way do these people share Fred's values.''
Church members released an open letter to Thompson this week, saying he had once discussed his views on homosexuality with them while handling the mid-1980s case of a woman who had sued Kansas's Republican attorney general for sexual harassment. Margie Phelps, daughter of Westboro founder Fred Phelps, recommended him for the case.
''We know what your position used to be on the homosexual question -- and it was wonderful, and we saw eye to eye,'' church members said in the letter.
But that statement appears to conflict with Margie Phelps's comments to the Journal-World newspaper of Kansas in June about her interaction with Thompson. ''I'm quite confident he would've completely disagreed with everything about my faith,'' she told the paper.
Phelps's sister, Shirley Phelps-Roper, said in a phone interview Wednesday that while Thompson might disagree with the church today, he did not disagree then.
And yet Phelps-Roper said, ''he wouldn't dare stand up and say that when he's running for president.''
Thompson, a former U.S. senator, has said he favors a constitutional amendment that bars judges from legalizing same-sex marriage but would leave the door open for state legislatures to act. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.