
A federal appeals court panel will review the dismissal of an accomplished Air Force nurse who was fired for being gay, according to the Associated Press.
James Lobsenz, a lawyer representing Maj. Margaret Witt, argued Monday that the dismissal violates his client’s right to freedom from governmental intrusion in her private life. The court, he said, should strike down the government’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy or at least reinstate an earlier lawsuit his client had filed against the government.
Witt, 42, was honorably discharged after her superiors learned that she had been in a long-term relationship with a civilian woman. An Air Force nurse for 18 years, Witt would have received entitlement benefits after two more years of service.
Lobsenz claimed that the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling against sodomy laws in Texas showed that the government has no right to intrude into the bedrooms of consenting adults. Witt’s relationship took place in Witt’s hometown of Spokane, Wash., hundreds of miles from McChord Air Base in western Washington, where she had been stationed.
“At all times she kept her sexual life private,” Lobsenz said, according to the AP.
Jonathan F. Cohn, a deputy assistant attorney general with the Department of Justice, acknowledged that the significance of the 2003 ruling is not completely clear, but he said “the court very clearly stops short of recognizing a fundamental right” to privacy for gays, according to the AP.
Witt, who joined the Air Force in 1987, cared for injured patients on military flights. A citation from President Bush in 2003 read, “Her airmanship and courage directly contributed to the successful accomplishment of important missions under extremely hazardous circumstances.” (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.