
The splintering of prominent Christian conservatives over the Republican presidential contenders reflects a schism -- between the dogma of God, guns, and gays and the desire to beat Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Months of disagreement within this important Republican voting bloc culminated this week in a flurry of endorsements:
Televangelist Pat Robertson is backing Rudy Giuliani. Conservative senator Sam Brownback is supporting fellow senator John McCain. Moral Majority cofounder Paul Weyrich is going for Mitt Romney.
All the candidates are flawed in the eyes of the Christian right, which is why some evangelical leaders are holding out and might favor a third-party candidate.
''You've got a wide-open primary, and you have various people who are ideologically acceptable -- not perfect, but ideologically acceptable,'' Brownback said in an interview Wednesday with the Associated Press.
''If they're acceptable and can win, that's better than losing,'' Brownback said, speaking by telephone on a campaign swing through Iowa with McCain. ''I think you're seeing a more pragmatic expression taking place.''
For his part, Robertson said he worries not about electability but about terrorists. Also, he feels reassured that Giuliani would appoint Supreme Court justices who view abortion from a conservative stance.
''To me, the overriding issue before the American people is the defense of our population from the bloodlust of Islamic terrorists,'' Robertson said.
''I don't think evangelicals have coalesced around any candidate,'' he said Wednesday in Washington, with Giuliani at his side. ''I just believe that I needed to make a statement, and I am speaking for myself, that...Rudy Giuliani is, without question, an acceptable candidate.''
There is very little any politician can do about abortion without a major shift in the federal judiciary, Robertson said, and Giuliani has promised to appoint judges in the mold of Chief Justice John Roberts and Supreme Court justices Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia.
Not everyone will take a favorable view of Robertson's endorsement. While his television show, The 700 Club, draws an estimated 1 million viewers daily, many evangelicals have distanced themselves from him. He drew criticism shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks for saying they happened because Americans had insulted God and lost the protection of heaven by allowing abortion and ''rampant Internet pornography.''
Giuliani said Wednesday he got to know Robertson well on a long flight from Israel.
''I came away from it with a better understanding of Pat, what he's all about, what he's trying to accomplish,'' he said. ''And I think he came away with a different impression of me, as well. We see the world, in many ways, the same way. Doesn't mean we agree on everything.''
This is not the first time evangelicals have split. In 1996 they were divided for months between former senator Bob Dole and conservative pundit Pat Buchanan. Christian conservatives rallied late in the process around Buchanan, but Dole became the nominee and later lost to Bill Clinton.
If evangelicals do not rally behind a single Giuliani rival, that could help the former New York City mayor, who is the Republican front-runner in national polls.
Among voters describing themselves as evangelical or born-again Christians, 24% have said they would vote for former senator Fred Thompson and 20% for Giuliani, according to Associated Press–Ipsos polls. Some 22% didn't have a favorite candidate.
As for Giuliani, ''he's working relentlessly to try and curry favor with conservatives,'' said Republican consultant Greg Mueller, who noted that Giuliani made a special trip to Washington last month to ask Brownback for support. ''He's trying to find common ground, because he knows he's got vulnerabilities.''
Evangelicals do not seem to feel all that good about any of their choices.
Not only does Giuliani back abortion rights, the former mayor has been married three times and has had frosty relations with his children.
Evangelicals still have bad blood with McCain, who has feuded for years with them and in 2000 called Robertson and Jerry Falwell ''agents of intolerance.''
And there is mistrust of Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, both because he has changed his mind on issues like abortion and because of his Mormon faith.
Other candidates are trying to take advantage of these flaws; Thompson began running TV ads in Iowa this week promoting his conservative voting record. Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, a Southern Baptist minister, reminds voters he is a die-hard social conservative.
Today, discord within the movement may run deeper than in the 1990s. The Christian right is maturing and has a new generation of leaders interested in issues beyond abortion and same-sex marriage, such as the environment and Darfur violence.
For example, pastor and best-selling author Rick Warren invited Sen. Barack Obama to speak at an AIDS summit at his megachurch last year, despite Obama's support for abortion rights.
''Part of this may very well be generational change,'' said John Green, senior fellow at the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.
''The Christian right has been around for about 30 years,'' Green said. ''Its founders are long in the tooth -- Falwell passed away; Robertson is in his 70s. There is a new generation of leaders coming up behind them that see things differently.''
Brownback said he's been caught up in the generational discord.
''There is a divide within the movement on topics like the environment and, to some degree, immigration,'' said Brownback, who has endured criticism for supporting a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. ''I've felt the buffeting from both sides.''
He predicted that in the coming weeks, candidates will start talking about issues important to the new generation of evangelical leaders, such as poverty. Differences are not always bad, he said.
''I think it's actually a good thing; I think it broadens the movement,'' he said. ''That probably is a more realistic picture of the faith too. It's more faith-oriented, not less.'' (Libby Quaid, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.