
A sharp-witted but unruly quiz show host, an ex–police officer once branded by a tabloid as ''commander crackpot'' over his support for softer drug laws, and an avowed leftist who keeps newts as pets: London's looming mayoral election promises to be a clash of mavericks.
The eccentric field for the May election filled out Tuesday, when Britain's third-ranked Liberal Democrat Party selected Brian Paddick, a former police commander known for his advocacy of a lenient approach on cannabis use.
Paddick and opposition Conservative Party hopeful Boris Johnson, a gaffe-prone legislator cherished for his humor and chaotic style, seek to oust two-term incumbent Ken Livingstone, himself a longtime magnet for controversy.
First elected in 2000, Livingstone has long raised eyebrows with his unguarded comments and choice of city hall guests. He has branded U.S. president George W. Bush as ''the greatest threat to life on this planet,'' told a Jewish reporter his job made him akin to a Nazi concentration camp guard, and labeled Washington's ambassador in London a ''chiseling little crook.''
Since taking office, Livingstone, who breeds newts, has also pushed a raft of environmental policy measures, including a divisive eight-pound daily levy on city-center driving.
Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez -- a strident critic of Bush and ex-British leader Tony Blair -- has been hosted at City Hall, striking a deal for a state-owned company to provide cheap oil for London's iconic red buses.
But Livingstone, who also banned the feeding of pigeons in the city's Trafalgar Square, has won two four-year terms and is praised for campaigning to secure the 2012 Olympics for London.
Livingstone's challengers hope their foibles are as easily overlooked by London's nearly 5.5 million voters.
Paddick was Britain's highest-ranking openly gay police officer until he resigned this year. He once claimed he was happy to ''turn a blind eye'' to minor drug use and, under his command, a London suburb launched an experiment in which those caught with marijuana escaped arrest.
Paddick told reporters Tuesday only he could unseat Livingstone, claiming Johnson could mount a challenge ''if he was prepared to stop playing the fool -- which he's not.''
But Johnson, admired for his comedic appearances on satirical TV news show Have I Got News for You, is likely to pose the greatest threat to Livingstone. His unruly blond hair and liberal use of bygone phrases such as ''crikey'' and ''gadzooks'' endear him to many.
The legislator and former magazine editor has used his charm to overcome criticism following alleged extramarital affairs and ill-advised comments.
In 2004, he was ordered by Conservative leaders to apologize after accusing the northern city of Liverpool of wallowing in victimhood after the beheading of a local man, Ken Bigley, in Iraq. The same year, Johnson resigned as his party's spokesman on culture following reports of an affair. In typical style, he branded the allegations ''an inverted pyramid of piffle.'' (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.