
A Wisconsin judge is allowing a legal challenge to the state's constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and civil unions. The amendment, approved by 59% of Wisconsin voters in 2006, is being contested by William McConkey, a University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh political science instructor, according to the Capital Times in Madison.
The challenge is based on the referendum vote. McConkey claims that the ballot posed two questions at once, which violates a section of the state constitution mandating that questions be asked separately when amending the constitution.
The state assistant attorney general filed to dismiss the suit on grounds that the challenger is not directly affected by the amendment. The Wisconsin Family Council filed a friend-of-the-court brief to back the state's attempt to dismiss. The group tried to get the amendment on the ballot for three years before finally succeeding in November 2006, the Daily Cardinal (the University of Wisconsin-Madison newspaper) reported.
McConkey said he is straight and married with nine children and seven grandchildren. An attorney arguing on his behalf said that the proposed amendment violated the constitutional requirements for referendum language because voters had to endorse both civil unions and same-sex marriage or neither -- there was no choice to endorse one and not the other.
According to Lambda Legal, the Wisconsin legislature blocked a bill in 2000 that would have allowed the state to not recognize marriages that took place in another state. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.