
Eight public municipalities will be barred from intervening in a lawsuit over domestic-partner benefits for state employees' partners, the Wisconsin supreme court ruled. The parties failed to show direct interest in the suit, the Associated Press reported Thursday.
The municipalities -- consisting of cities, towns, villages, and school districts, according to court documents -- wanted a role in the case because they believed they would have to start paying increased health care costs.
Larry Dupuis, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Wisconsin, told the University of Wisconsin Daily Cardinal that he believes the decision will allow the case to move promptly.
“Now the parties … to the case can litigate the case the way that they need to litigate it, without other people bringing a bunch of motions and doing things that could delay the case for years and years,” Dupuis told the Cardinal.
The lawsuit was filed by a group of six current and former state employees and their partners against the Wisconsin government. The court's ruling upholds two lower court rulings against the municipalities. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.