
A lesbian couple who wanted to marry in Colorado is suing the state to overturn a voter-approved ballot measure that amended the state constitution to ban same-sex marriage. Kate Burns and Sheila Schroeder, of Englewood, Colo., filed the suit in the Denver County court on Monday asking that the amendment be declared unconstitutional, according to the Rocky Mountain News.
"The right to marriage is fundamental," Mari Newman, the couple's attorney, said to the News. "The government can't be telling us who we can and cannot marry."
More than half of voters approved Amendment 43 in 2006, which Schroeder and Burns argue is unconstitutional, in part because it was presented in a religiously motivated manner and has the effect of "establishing religion."
State representative Kevin Lundberg, a Republican who supported the amendment, countered that the women's argument could be applied to any law, since most laws are based on some moral perspective, which he says are derived from religious foundations.
Schroeder and Burns are slated to appear in the Denver County court this week on trespassing charges after attempting to obtain a marriage license in the Denver clerk's office. They were arrested September 24, 2007, for refusing to leave when they were denied the certificate. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.