
The American Civil Liberties Union sent a letter to tax specialists H&R Block on Tuesday, demanding the company change its online tax preparation system to accommodate Connecticut gay couples in civil unions, according to an ACLU press release.
Jason Smith of Hartford, Conn., attempted to file with his partner of six years, Settimio Pisu, in January, but they were told to prepare their forms in person or by phone because the website does not include a form for civil unions.
The letter that ACLU staff attorney Rebecca Shore sent to H&R Block says the company is in violation of Connecticut antidiscrimination laws by failing to provide civil union couples the option of filing their taxes online, as it does for married couples. Filing federal and local taxes with a specialist would cost Pisu and Smith $199.80.
"This is yet another example of the many ways that civil unions just don't live up to marriage," Smith said in the release. "We're saving for a house and hoping to start a family, so every penny counts right now."
Denies Sposato, a spokesperson for H&R Block, told The Advocate that the company was in the process of evaluating adding domestic partner support to the online tax preparation program.
"This is an industry-wide issue affecting TaxCut and our competitors, resulting from the federal government not recognizing the domestic-partner filing status," she said in an email. "With an online tax program, whatever the filing status is on the federal return is automatically deployed to the state return."
Users who are registered domestic partners or in civil unions are asked to work with a tax professional because interaction enables them to prepare several tax returns simultaneously, which Sposato said is a feature that is not currently available with any online tax programs.
"In addition," she said, "we offer Online Office that enables users to access one of our tax professionals for tax return preparation from the comfort of their home. We believe these options offer a straightforward and accurate method to serve the Connecticut domestic-partner filers."
The civil union law has been in effect in the state for nearly three years, according to ACLU Connecticut's Andrew Schneider, who asserts that companies aren't taking the law seriously. "There is no excusable reason why the company that likes to claim it’s the world’s largest tax services provider shouldn't make its products available to everyone."
According to the ACLU, the tax requirements for Connecticut couples in civil unions are similar to the requirements for same-sex married couples in nearby Massachusetts, for whom H&R Block makes provisions. (Michelle Garcia, The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.