Philly's Liberty City Democrats Back Clinton  | News | Advocate.com

||  News  ||
March 27, 2008
Philly's Liberty City Democrats Back Clinton

Philadelphia’s Liberty City Democratic Club, one of three Pennsylvania chapters of the National Stonewall Democrats, has endorsed Hillary Clinton for president. Stonewall’s Steel City Democratic Club in Pittsburgh had previously endorsed Clinton while the Capital Region Club in Harrisburg has not voted on the matter.

Though Clinton clinched the endorsement with more than two thirds of the vote, the Sunday night meeting was not without contention. Both cochairs of Liberty City are Obama supporters, and according to Clinton supporter Jonathan Oriole, who attended the meeting, discussion ensued about postponing the vote or potentially not endorsing a candidate at all.

“If we chose not to endorse in this race, we might as well not endorse in any race,” said Oriole, adding, “I spoke about this being our job.”

One Liberty City cochair, who asked not to be identified for this story, said the club was pleased to make an endorsement based on the wishes of the membership.

In a prepared statement from her campaign, Clinton said, “I am honored to receive the support of the Liberty Democratic Club. LGBT Americans have been a part of this campaign from the start and I look forward to working with members of the Liberty Democratic Club to ensure that their voices are heard in this important Pennsylvania primary.”

Clinton must log a decisive win in the Keystone State’s April 22 primary in order to build a case for why she should be the Democratic nominee. Obama has more pledged delegates (those allotted by state votes) and currently leads in the popular vote. Pundits generally agree that she will need a solid string of wins in other states that have yet to vote, plus an upset in at least one state where Obama is expected to win, such as North Carolina or Oregon. Because it is mathematically impossible for either candidate to secure the nomination through pledged delegates alone, both candidates are directing their message at the 300-plus superdelegates who remain uncommitted and hold the key to the nomination.

LGBT activists in Pennsylvania have a number of competing interests in the Democratic race. While two of the three Stonewall chapters have endorsed Clinton, Obama’s national LGBT policy chair, Tobias Wolff, is based in Philadelphia, and the state’s highest-ranking LGBT official, Stephen Glassman, also supports Obama.

Oriole, who has volunteered for Clinton in New Hampshire, Texas, New York, New Jersey, and Delaware, said the situation in Pennsylvania is uncharted territory for him. Prior to the Clinton campaign having paid staffers in the state, he said people had already begun taking initiative in terms of organizing.

“I’ve never been in this kind of campaign before. I’ve always been involved in top-down campaigns,” said Oriole. “The challenge for both us and the campaign is how do we encourage people to continue to take initiative while not overlapping or stepping on each other toes.” (Kerry Eleveld, The Advocate)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Be the first to comment on this story.

Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.