A panel in Arizona, where voters once turned down a constitutional ban on gay marriage, approved a plan Tuesday to provide taxpayer-subsidized health coverage for the domestic partners of state employees and retirees.
The Governor's Regulatory Review Council, which has the final say over many agencies' proposed rules, voted 4–0 to approve changes floated by the Department of Administration, with support from Gov. Janet Napolitano, a Democrat. Some Republican legislators opposed the move.
Dependents of domestic partners also will qualify. Employees will be able to sign up for benefits as of October 1.
Supporters said providing benefits to partners and their dependents would help the state reduce costly turnover by being more competitive in recruitment and retention. Napolitano, among others, has argued that it was a question of fairness.
In her first year in office, Napolitano issued an executive order banning sexual orientation–based discrimination in state personnel practices.
Critics said the benefits rule changes would undermine the institution of marriage, burden the state with added costs at a time of budget trouble, and by doing it through rule changes, trample the legislature's policy-making role.
The state senate last month narrowly rejected a Republican measure to block the move through changing state law to define ''dependent'' as a spouse or unmarried child of an employee or retiree.
There are about 65,000 state employees and 9,000 state retirees in Arizona. According to state estimates, the number of partners likely to be covered ranges from 317 to 853.
Arizona voters made their state in 2006 the only one to ever defeat a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage. At least 15 other states already provide domestic-partner benefits. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.