
A commonly used AIDS drug appears to nearly double the risk of a heart attack, researchers said Tuesday. In a study published online by the medical journal Lancet, the researchers also said another less frequently used AIDS drug increased the chances of a heart attack by 50%. Experts said doctors should be aware of the increased risks, but they did not recommend that patients abandon the two drugs, Ziagen and Videx.
AIDS drugs ''are wonderful and lifesaving, but they do have toxicity problems,'' said Dr. Charlie Gilks, an AIDS treatment expert at the World Health Organization. ''It may be that we can continue to use them, but we need to be aware of their long-term problems.''
AIDS drugs are used in combinations, so they could be swapped with others if necessary.
Experts have suspected that AIDS drugs could cause heart problems, but no definitive evidence has been available. The drugs come with many side effects, including liver and kidney failure, chronic fatigue syndrome, hepatitis, and jaundice.
Jens D. Lundgren of the University of Copenhagen and colleagues analyzed data from more than 33,000 people infected with the AIDS virus in Europe, the United States, and Australia to study the long-term effects of five AIDS drugs. The patients were followed for up to five years to see who had heart problems.
In the 754 patients who had heart attacks, 192 had recently taken Ziagen, also known as abacavir, and 124 had recently taken Videx, also known as didanosine.
Those who took Ziagen, included in many AIDS regimens worldwide, had twice the chances of a heart attack compared to patients on other AIDS drugs, the researchers reported. Those on Videx had a 50% higher chance. But the risk disappeared six months after patients stopped taking the drugs.
Lundgren said patients already susceptible to heart problems were most at risk.
For men over 40 who smoked and were overweight, the risk of a heart attack were as high as 20%. Taking Ziagen increased that risk to nearly 40%.
For those without known heart risks, the chances of a heart attack were low, between 1% to 5%. Once they were on the drug, their risk ranged from 2% to nearly 7%.
No increased heart attack risk was found for patients on the other drugs in the study, zidovudine (AZT), stavudine (Zerit), or lamivudine (Epivir). The medications all block an enzyme that the AIDS virus needs to multiply.
GlaxoSmithKline PLC, which makes Ziagen, said their own analysis of their database of about 14,600 HIV patients, did not support the Lancet study's conclusions.
''We were unable to show any increased risk in heart attacks,'' said Gwenan White, a company spokeswoman.
The findings could influence how AIDS patients are treated globally, as health authorities like WHO reconsider their treatment guidelines. Ziagen and Videx are currently recommended by WHO for people with HIV worldwide.
''In developed countries, doctors have 24 different antiretrovirals to choose from if one isn't appropriate. But if that happens in resource-poor countries, it is not so simple,'' said Gilks, who was not connected to the study.
As AIDS patients continue to live longer, experts said they would probably see more of the rarer side effects emerge.
''No drug is risk-free,'' Lundgren said. ''For all patients, it's a matter of finding the right balance.''
The research was funded by the European Medicines Agency, a regulatory group, which solicited contributions from makers of AIDS drugs for studies on their long-term effects. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.