
A coalition of 117 human rights groups worldwide is denouncing not only Egypt for arresting and detaining HIV-positive men for the "habitual practice of debauchery" but also many of the detainees' doctors, who participated in the illegal crackdown. Five men scheduled to face trial in Cairo on April 9 are part of a group of at least 12 who have been jailed since October 2007 simply because they are living with HIV or AIDS. According to international group Human Rights Watch, the crackdown occurred with the participation of medical personnel. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch wrote an open letter to Egypt's health ministry and the Egyptian Doctors’ Syndicate, reprimanding doctors for their breaches of doctor-patient confidentiality.
“Doctors must put patients first, not join a witch-hunt driven by prejudice,” Joe Amon, director of the HIV/AIDS program at Human Rights Watch, said in a statement released Monday. “Now more than 100 human rights groups are reminding Egyptian doctors of the oath they took to respect patients’ privacy, autonomy, and consent. This is one of the oldest traditions of medical responsibility, as well as an obligation under human rights law.”
Doctors in Egypt take an oath based on the Geneva Declaration of the World Medical Association, which says doctors must not use the medical knowledge of a patient to "violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat."
The arrests began last year when one man who was stopped on the street by police during an altercation notified them he was HIV-positive. Police arrested him and the man with him, assaulted them, and interrogated them to obtain the names of other HIV-positive men, according to HRW. Each man was charged with the "habitual practice of debauchery," or consensual sex between two men.
Doctors from the health ministry also subjected the detainees to HIV tests without their consent, according to the press release. The prisoners who tested positive for the virus were held in hospitals and chained to their beds, being released from the chains only after publication of their treatment and the resulting public outcry.
A Cairo court convicted four of the 12 men arrested, sentencing them to a year in prison on January 18. On February 2 their sentences were upheld by an appellate court. A month later, Cairo prosecutors indicted five more men, who face trial on Wednesday. The charges against the remaining three men were dropped. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.