The Human Rights Campaign released a list Monday of U.S. Senate candidate endorsements -- 14 in all -- but more surprising than who was on the list was who wasn't. Openly gay Democrat Jim Neal, who is running for Elizabeth Dole's seat in North Carolina, did not receive an endorsement in his primary race against state senator Kay Hagan.
Joe Solmonese, HRC president, told The Washington Blade that his group would wait until after the May 6 primary before deciding whom to endorse. Hagan "has a good record," Solmonese told the Blade. "It's a tough race to call in terms of the primary, and so I think, you know, our community down there -- sometimes sitting here in Washington, Jim Neal is certainly someone who a lot of people have really been following here in Washington as an openly gay candidate, but our community down in North Carolina is really rather split between him and Kay Hagan."
"Maybe I'm not gay enough," Neal told the Blade, adding that he wasn't surprised by the omission. "HRC hasn't really been supportive of the campaign for their own reasons, and they're entitled to do so. But elections are won not by endorsements but by votes. That's just how it works. I'm not trying to rack up endorsements. I'm trying to rack up votes."
The candidates HRC did endorse include: Max Baucus (D-Mont.), Joe Biden (D-Del.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Al Franken (D-Minn.), Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), John Kerry (D-Mass.), Mary Landrieu (D-La.), Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), Carl Levin (D-Mich.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Mark Udall (D-Colo.), and Tom Udall (D-N.M.). (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.