Marriage Equality Opponents Seek Stay of Supreme Court Decision  | News | Advocate.com

Advocate.com health Channel
||  News  ||
 
May 23, 2008
Marriage Equality Opponents Seek Stay of Supreme Court Decision
Marriage Equality Opponents Seek Stay of Supreme Court Decision

A conservative legal group asked the California supreme court on Thursday to put off finalization of its decision legalizing same-sex marriage until voters get a chance to weigh in.

The Arizona-based Alliance Defense Fund wants the ruling stayed until November, when voters will probably encounter a ballot measure that would amend the state constitution to ban gay marriage. That amendment would overturn the justices' ruling.

In court papers submitted late Thursday, the group warned that the state would suffer ''great public harm and mischief'' if it began allowing same-sex marriages on June 16, when the court's decision would ordinarily become final.

Defense Fund attorneys also said implementing the ruling in the meantime would be an unnecessary expense for the state and cause unneeded confusion for couples.

''Permitting this decision to take effect immediately -- in light of the realistic possibility that the people of California might amend their constitution to reaffirm marriage as the union of one man and one woman -- risks legal havoc and uncertainty of immeasurable magnitude,'' the attorneys wrote in the petition.

Many couples started planning weddings and making appointments to secure marriage licenses immediately after the justices overturned the state's gay marriage ban on May 15.

A cloud of uncertainty lingers over the pending unions, however. A coalition of religious and social conservative groups is in the process of putting a measure on the November ballot that would write a gay marriage ban into the state constitution.

County clerks have until June 18 to verify the signatures needed to qualify the amendment for the election, according to the Defense Fund. A preliminary count by 37 counties indicates that the initiative has a high chance of being put to voters, the group said in its petition.

Defense Fund attorneys asked the supreme court to hold a hearing on when its decision should take effect or to amend it to prevent it from being implemented for now.

''The people of California have a constitutional right to vote on marriage, and we trust the high court will respect the democratic process,'' said Defense Fund senior counsel Glen Lavy, who argued before the court for maintaining the state's one-man, one-woman marriage laws.

Among the logistical nightmares the attorneys predicted are counties scheduling different start dates based on their ability to create new, gender-neutral marriage licenses and the question of whether marriages sanctioned during the five-month window would be annulled if the amendment passes.

The court majority did not give a deadline for county clerks to start issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. But it directed state officials "to take all actions necessary to effectuate our ruling," including requiring county marriage clerks to carry out their duties "in a manner consistent with the decision of this court."

The Defense Fund is representing the Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund, a California group that is part of the coalition spearheading the proposed amendment. Approving a temporary stay, the Defense Fund argued, is justified until voters have the chance to decide in November the fate of marriage in California.

Justices have until June 16 to consider the Defense Fund's petition, according to Jennifer Pizer, an attorney with the gay rights legal group Lambda Legal. They also could grant themselves an additional 60 days to assess it, Pizer said.

Pizer, who is planning an October wedding, said that even if the stay request results in delays, gay and lesbian couples should be heartened by the supreme court victory.

"What's critical in all of this is, society generally and those of us who are affected most urgently have to recognize that we have momentous, joyous moments of breakthrough but the process of social and legal change proceeds step by step," she said.  (AP)

Keywords:  California marriage  marriage 
© 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Fred Remus
    Date posted: 2008-05-25 9:23 AM
    Hometown: Naples, New York

    Comment:

    First off, why is the article head-lined 'conservative group wants to...'? It should say 'bigots want to...'. Why are we soft on hate mongers? That is Ronald Reagans legacy, you can hate all you want, and be blatant about it, as long as you attach a certain political or religious affiliation to it. And since when are a persons most basic human rights up for a vote? Either we live by the U.S. Constitution which states ALL people are equal, or we abandon it and start a new society. It is nothing new that conservatives don't believe in the Constitution, but we do and we should always make that known, loud and clear!


  • Name: Don Howe-Hughes
    Date posted: 2008-05-23 10:06 PM
    Hometown: Oxford, MA

    Comment:

    I find it amazing that these conservative groups can come in from other areas and try to impose their beliefs. We had the same problem in Massachusetts, but luckily our Representative and Senators stopped a vote going on the ballots to change the constitution. My husband and I have been very happy the last 4 years since we have been married. I also do not see where Massachusetts came to ''great public harm and mischief'' because for smae-sex marriages.


  • Name: Sandra
    Date posted: 2008-05-23 3:04 PM
    Hometown: Mount Rainier, Maryland

    Comment:

    I still have difficulty understanding how society can dictate personal relationships between mutually consenting adults. It doesn't matter if the relation ship is heterosexual, polygamist, gay, or porngraphic. As long as there's no killing or torture or pedophilia, who am I to tell my neighbors who they can or cannot marry?


  • Name: JERRY J ZEEKAF
    Date posted: 2008-05-23 3:01 PM
    Hometown: Spring Valley, CA

    Comment:

    Missing The Target: Seems to me we're missing the target here, kinda like W going into Iraq when we shoulda stayed in Afghanistan. This whole "war" is being fought with the wrong weapons and on the wrong front. You remember WHY those folks left England few hundred years ago? Hint: Separation of Church and State. I'm think'n it's somewhere in our Constitution too. In fact I'm sure it is. Folks, these religious groups are overstepping their boundaries. They are stepping into the political arena, an arena they have no right to be in. Now if they want to get into politics, TAX THEM! Nothing is more fearsome to them than the prospect of taking their tax exempt status away. Hit them where it hurts the rest us us, in the pocket book. Thats how we gotta fight this war. Thats how we'll win this war, thats the weapon we need to use.


  • Name: Fred W
    Date posted: 2008-05-23 4:44 AM
    Hometown: Minneapolis

    Comment:

    The California Same Sex Marriage law offers a golden chance for GLBT couples. The court decision approved that, GLBT couples only way to achieve their right to marry is to take real life couple cases to the courts all around the country., The best thing GLBT couples can to do now; arrange and support huge marriage parties In California involving thousands of real couples around the country. Than when these married couple returned to their home states they should take their cases to States`s Supreme courts. On the same times as soon as the California ban the same sexy marriage by vote, thousands of the married same sexy couples should taka cases to Federal Supreme Court.


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • U.S. Politics From a Distance
    As America continues to rejoice in election of Barack Obama -- while gay Californians lament the passing of Prop. 8 -- overseas, political activists look on from a distance. Zachery Scott has watched the drama following Election Day unfold as he serves in the Peace Corps in Mozambique.
  • Shoshana Bean Is Lookin' for a Superhero
    Not many girls can wow a Broadway crowd in shows like Wicked and Hairspray, then turn around and bring the audience to its feet at the Soul Train Lady of Soul Awards. But Shoshana Bean goes far beyond what most people might expect, as evidenced by her soulful debut album, Superhero.
  • 30 Years Later, We Can Still Learn from Milk
    COMMENTARY: Thirty years after the death of Harvey Milk, Americans can still learn from his inspiring and profound work as an activist, politician and friend. With the story of his life opening in theatres this week, Lane Hudson takes a look back at how Milk's legacy lives on -- and what we can to do pay tribute to the legend.
  • Urban Cowboy
    How does a brand that is over a century old make itself cool again? With a little help from the gays. Levi Strauss & Co. sponsored the world premiere of Milk at the Castro Theatre in San Francisco in October, and The Advocate sat down with the out president of the denim company, Robert Hanson, that afternoon to find out what Levi's and Harvey Milk have in common.
  • L.A. Gay Center Responds to Prop. 8 Criticism
    In the December 16 edition of The Advocate, writer Ben Ehrenreich analyzed the differing opinions of why Prop. 8 passed at the polls in his article, "Anatomy of a Failed Campaign." Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center chief public affairs officer Jim Key responds to the criticisms raised by that article.
  • Billy Baldwin Pleads for Return of Dirty Sexy Money
    Actor William Baldwin is half of one of TV’s most groundbreaking couples -- his Dirty Sexy Money character is in love with a transsexual, played by Candis Cayne -- but it’s one plot that may not get to play itself out, as the show is in danger of cancellation. Baldwin sat down with Advocate.com to talk about rumors that ABC is "de-gaying" its lineup, what the future holds for Money, and whether network heads ever interfered with his controversial story line.
  • The Kid Stays in the Picture
    Lana Turner's lesbian daughter, Cheryl Crane, has penned her second memoir about her late, great movie star mother -- Lana: The Memories, the Myths, the Movies. Crane sits down with The Advocate to relive that fateful night she killed her mother's mobster lover, share some untold stories, and give us a sneak peek at the new photographs of their life together.
  • The Soul of Seal
    Armed with a new album of soul classics and his trademark blunt outlook on the state of the world, Seal sat down with Advocate.com to discuss the rumors that he and wife Heidi Klum would have left the country had John McCain been elected, the gay rights movement, and what makes Seal's sound so damn sexy.
  • Finding the Silver Lining in Defeat
    Three weeks ago, like many LGBT Americans, I woke up with, to say the least, mixed feelings. The euphoria of Barack Obama’s election and the expansion of the pro-LGBT majority in Congress was tempered by sadness and anger at our devastating losses in Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, and, of course, California. The silver lining of these defeats has been a renewed focus nationwide on the issue of marriage equality.
  • Separation of Sundance and State
    In 2009, Sundance will celebrate 25 years of bringing together international cinema and a variety of cultures in Park City, Utah. But with California's gay community reeling from the passage of Prop. 8, activists and filmmakers are suggesting a boycott of the festival and theater chain Cinemark, whose CEO donated a substantial sum to the marriage ban's campaign. But just how realistic is a boycott of an entire state?
  • Democratic Supermajority No Guarantee for Gay Progress
    The 2008 election may already be one for the record books, but triumphant Democrats are still vying for an elusive political prize -- the 60-seat supermajority required to overcome Republican filibuster attempts and advance their legislative agenda swiftly beginning in January. But what are the odds of actually getting 60 seats -- and will it really push gay rights to the front of the line?
  • From the Great White Way to the White House
    While there won’t be a woman in the White House anytime in the near future, 24 took the reins and elected to cast two-time Tony Award winner Cherry Jones as its first female president, Allison Taylor, who is likely to have everything including terrorists, WMDs, and the kitchen sink thrown at her. Jones sat down with The Advocateto talk marriage, the White House, and her "fluid" relationship with partner Sarah Paulson.
  • Handicapping the LGBT Priorities of President-elect Obama
    As the Obama-Biden transition ensues, insights are surfacing into the new administration's agenda for gay Americans. While many of the policy pronouncements read like a list of old favorites, some lesser-known initiatives will likely gain momentum early on.
  • A Fortune 500 Take on Prop. 8
    The old saying goes that every cloud has a silver lining. And on November 5, the day after California voters stripped same-sex couples of the right to marry, so many around the country were searching for one. Although thousands of individuals, organizations, and businesses donated to the Yes on 8 campaign, not one Fortune 500 company is among those names. But on the opposite side, the side of fairness and basic rights, you’ll find some of the nation’s most successful and powerful corporate players.
  • Chevy Volt: The Jolt GM Needs?
    Launching a new vehicle while the American auto industry is asking Congress for a $25 billion bailout might seem like illogical timing, but for General Motors and the people behind Chevy Volt, it’s essential. With their backs against the wall, GM is rolling out their much-anticipated first plug-in electric vehicle -- and focusing their marketing efforts on the gay community.
  • Dr. Phil Weighs in on Prop. 8
    Advocate.com gets an early peek at a very heated episode of Dr. Phil. Gavin Newsom, HRC's Joe Solmonese, and L.A. attorney Gloria Allred face off against Prop. 8 supporters to talk same-sex marriage. In what may well be a first, Dr. Phil told the audience he would be keeping his opinions to himself.
  • An Unpopular Opinion: Blacks, Gays, and Prop. 8
    The injection of race into the analysis of Proposition 8's passage is extremely disappointing. A battle for equal rights has now turned into an issue of whites versus blacks. But while some black gays think marriage shouldn't be a priority and that outreach to African-Americans should have been stronger, journalist Clay Cane says he has a vested interest in inequalities related to both race and sexual orientation ... and he doesn't need someone to hold his hand to believe that marriage equality is important.
  • Politics and Progress With Patti LaBelle
    The last time girl-group Labelle dropped an album, the thought of a black president or same-sex marriage seemed as “far-out” as the band’s disco-spacewoman suits and fusion of disco, rock, and soul. But the button-pushing, soul-singing trio has reunited, and on the heels of Prop. 8 passing and Barack Obama being elected president, Patti LaBelle talks to The Advocate about the mix of emotions she's dealt with over the past few weeks.
  • Seth Meyers's Big Gay Saturday Night
    SNL funnyman Seth Meyers talks to Advocate.com about last week's episode of Saturday Night Live -- the gayest episode in the history of the show, by some accounts. With touches including Justin Timberlake as Beyoncé's backup dancer and Snagglepuss crashing Weekend Update, it caused some bloggers to take offense ... but Meyers says it's just the sort of stuff that stemmed from many discussions about Prop. 8.
  • All Hands, Black and White, On Deck
    The high number of African-Americans who voted to pass Proposition 8 may have surprised some people, but not the folks at the National Black Justice Coalition, a civil rights organization dedicated to empowering black LGBT Americans. NBJC's CEO offers some insights about the black-white divide and how to mend it going forward.