

A federal appeals court in Boston on Monday threw out the lawsuit Cook v. Gates, which challenged the constitutionality of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” the military policy that prohibits lesbian, gay, and bisexual Americans from serving openly in the military.
The federal court of appeals for the first circuit of Boston dismissed the case, ruling that "special deference" must be given to Congress in situations where federal statutes regulate military affairs, Agence France-Presse reported.
Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, which lobbies for repeal of the policy, released a statement saying he was disappointed with the decision and was weighing options as to how to move forward. “SLDN applauds the perseverance of the 12 men and women who have brought this case," he said. "We are consulting with the plaintiffs and assessing all possible options before making a decision on our next step.”
The decision is at odds with the ruling in a similar case made by the federal appeals court of San Francisco, where the court upheld a lawsuit brought by a decorated Air Force nurse, Major Margaret Witt, who was allegedly forced out of the military for being a lesbian after 20 years of service.
Legal experts say the discrepancy of the two rulings will likely land the issue in the U.S. Supreme Court. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.