Health Promo 03 (Getty) | Advocate.com
||  News  ||
 
June 18, 2008

Lorri Jean on the Battle Ahead

 “In light of the fundamental nature of the substantive rights embodied in the right to marry—and their central importance to an individual’s opportunity to live a happy, meaningful, and satisfying life as a full member of society—the California Constitution properly must be interpreted to guarantee this basic civil right to all individuals and couples, without regard their sexual orientation.” —Ronald George, California Chief Justice

I’ll never forget when I learned of the California Supreme Court’s historic decision to overturn the ban on marriage between gay and lesbian couples. A group of us were in my office at the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center at 10 a.m., nervously waiting for the opinion to be posted on the Court web site. As soon as we learned that justice had prevailed, it was as if our community had won the World Series, the Superbowl and Wimbledon all at once. I cheered, I cried, I ran up and down the halls spreading the news and hugging everyone within reach. Then I called the people I love most in the world, my partner of more than 16 years, Gina M. Calvelli, and my Mom.

Finally. Finally I would be able to legally marry the person I have chosen to spend my life with.

Of course, from my perspective as a “professional homosexual,” the moment was one of almost unprecedented power. Given the status of marriage in our society and the influence of California, this is among the most important victories in our entire civil rights movement.

What I hadn’t expected was the power of the moment personally. I had never questioned whether gay and lesbian people should have the right to marry. But, like many of us, I had mixed emotions over the years about joining a flawed and failing heterosexual institution.

In time it became clear to me that such concerns did not resonate with most LGBT people. All of us grew up knowing that marriage was what people who loved each other did. No matter the failure rate, no matter the sexism, it was the central social institution in our lives. Everyone understands what it means to be married. The same cannot be said about what it means to be “domestic partnered.”

Ultimately, my perspective evolved. After Gina and I survived a difficult separation, we felt stronger than ever. As marriage became legal in other countries, we began to talk about tying the knot. But because it wouldn’t be legal here, it seemed meaningless. We already had the commitment. What we wanted was legal equality.

But once the prospect of marriage became real in California, I was surprised by how it made me feel. And how others reacted.

Once Gina and I announced our wedding plans, we felt giddy. Our family members on both sides were thrilled and began making travel plans to attend the festivities. My brother was so excited when we visited him the week after the decision that he greeted us with a celebratory bottle of champagne. A straight friend’s four-year-old son wanted to know if we were now going to have a baby!

While nothing in our relationship had really changed, suddenly everything was different. Straight friends and family—especially the kids—now had a context they understood. Though they had fully accepted us before, they were now able to welcome us to the “real” institution. The one they enjoy. They were almost happier for us than we were for ourselves!

Our LGBT friends are thrilled too. Congratulations and support flowed our way. Of course, Gina and I don’t need a legal marriage to make our relationship real. We've weathered the tough times and are in it together for life, whether the government treats us fairly or not.

Still, something has changed for us now. And it’s not just the fun we’re having referring to each other as “fiancée” or the way we’re being treated or the fascinating ups and downs of the wedding planning process. What we are preparing for feels very serious; like we’re on a different path now. I’m still trying to figure out exactly why. Regardless, I intend to enjoy it all.

But my enjoyment is tempered by my concern about the future. Because even as we celebrate, individually and as a community, a question hangs over our heads: How long will it last?

In less than five months, California voters will face a ballot measure that would once again deny gay and lesbian people the fundamental right to marry the person of our choice. The easy answer is to get angry. After all, it’s wrong to put anyone’s fundamental freedoms up for a vote. But the right answer is to get busy—and defeat this measure in November.

The good news is that we’ve got a case to make to the vast majority of voters—regardless of how they may feel about marriage for gay and lesbian couples. After all, you don’t have to love the concept of marriage equality to believe that the laws of our state shouldn’t single people out for unfair treatment. Or that the government has no business telling adults who they can and cannot marry, just like it has no business telling people what we can do in the privacy of our own homes. Or that we don't need more government in our private lives. Our case is both simple and universal: Gay or straight—we all deserve fundamental fairness. We all should have the same rights and freedoms, the same right to personal privacy and the same right to decide for ourselves how to live and who to love.

The freedom to marry is fundamental, like the freedom of religion and the freedom of speech. Those freedoms must be protected—not just by our community—but by all who enjoy them. As the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. taught, “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

Someday, everyone will accept the committed, loving relationships in our community as the wonderful, affirmations of life we all know them to be. Unfortunately, Election Day won’t be that day. But it can be a day when voters declare—once and for all—that our Constitution protects everyone equally. That it protects the privacy of every Californian. And that it lets every one of us decide for ourselves who to love and who to marry.

Someday, we will win their hearts. Until then, let’s make sure we win their votes.

Let’s not just celebrate on June 17. Let’s make it last a lifetime.

Jean is the CEO of the L.A. Gay and Lesbian Center. 

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: CHris Sullivan
    Date posted: 2008-06-18 10:34 AM
    Hometown: Chicago, IL

    Comment:

    If the November balllot inititaive does pass - those marriages will likely be in a legal limbo and the State Supreme Court may well have to decide on the validity of those marriages. I would expect they would vote along the same lines as on the gay marriage issue and likley validate those marriages. So, if you are a same sex couple in California, I really wold not wait to get married until after November. If the measure does pass, you may well have lost your opportunity to have a legally recognized marriage in California for the forseeable future.


  • Name: Bonnie
    Date posted: 2008-06-18 9:40 AM
    Hometown: White Plains, NY

    Comment:

    Congratulations and keep up the fight for if we don't, our basic civil rights will be lost to "the stroke of a pen." Keep a smile on your face and love in your heart!


  • Name: Laurie
    Date posted: 2008-06-18 2:13 AM
    Hometown: Fountain Valley

    Comment:

    If the bill passes in November 2008 what does that mean for those marriages between June 17th and November? thank you and everyone else involved for all the years of hard work, deligence, and persistence.


  • Name: AM
    Date posted: 2008-06-17 4:41 PM
    Hometown: L.A.

    Comment:

    Keep up the good work!


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • Letter From the Editor
    We’d like to unveil a big change: after nearly four decades as a biweekly magazine, we’re going monthly.
  • Parental Control
    San Francisco State researcher Caitlin Ryan explains the importance behind a study linking suicide and drug use among gay children to parental rejection.
  • Austerity Chic
    How novelist and performance artist Mike Albo gets by in lean times.
  • Hoping to "Wu" Michelle
    Dressing Michelle Obama in November was a game changer for designer Jason Wu. Now he has his sights set on the future first lady’s most high-profile event: Inauguration Day.
  • Boi From Troy Signs Off
    After five years of raising eyebrows on the Web, Boi From Troy blogger -- and gay Republican -- Scott Schmidt is signing off.
  • A Desert Journey
    The Mii Amo spa in Sedona, Ariz., is famous for packages designed to lead people through a spiritual as well as physical transformation. One writer relinquishes herself to the journey and recounts her days in one of the world's most beautiful destination resorts.
  • A List: Chris Evans
    Chris Evans is a serious actor but that doesn’t mean he wants you to stop objectifying him.
  • Great American Couple
    In an exclusive excerpt from his new book, Hollywood Bohemians: Transgressive Sexuality and the Selling of the Movieland Dream, Brett L. Abrams explores the relationship between Cary Grant and Randolph Scott, who led homosexual lives right under everyone's nose.
  • Mormons Gone Wild
    After one man undresses missionaries for his calendar, LDS Church–owned Brigham Young University strips him of his degree.
  • Constructive Impatience
    Stung by the Warren decision, GLAAD's former executive director Joan Garry offers the Obama transition team some sage advice.
  • Boxer Goes Trans for Eli Stone
    Often perceived as male by confused casting agents, boxer-body builder turned actor Dallas Malloy felt a deep connection to the trans minister she plays on Eli Stone.
  • Mamma Mia! Rises Again
    Meryl Streep and company managed to top Harry Potter and Titanic at the U.K. box office, and now Mamma Mia! is poised to break similar records on DVD. Director Phyllida Lloyd talked to Advocate.com about bringing one of the biggest musicals of all time to the big screen.
  • The Other White Meat
    As one of the subjects of the documentary about the drag pageant circuit, Pageant, opening in select theaters, and one of the contestants on RuPaul's Drag Race, premiering next month on Logo, Victoria "Porkchop" Parker may not look or act like your typical female impersonator, but make no mistake, she is one of the best.
  • The Religious Defense
    In an excerpt from her new book, Bulletproof Faith: A Spiritual Survival Guide for Gay and Lesbian Christians, author Candace Chellew-Hodge incorporates the wisdom of Xena: Warrior Princess to illustrate her theories as to how gay and lesbian people of faith can protect themselves from those who attack their views.
  • Photo Finish
    Did Prop. 8 backlash cause art censorship -- or its reversal -- at Brigham Young University? Could be, as BYU photography student J. Michael Wiltbank found when his contribution to a two-week-long art exhibition -- eight pairs of benign portraits, each depicting an LGBT-identified BYU student alongside a supportive friend -- had been removed.
  • The Divine Miss M.
    Since the death of performer Wayland Flowers in 1988, his over-the-top puppet creation Madame has been seen only sporadically. But with the launch of her new casino tour, Madame is back.
  • Whither NLGJA?
    The leading professional organization for LGBT journalists is facing a crisis that threatens its very survival. In a changing media landscape and a tough economy, how does a small nonprofit live up to its mission and retain members?
  • The Road to Equality
    Barbara Boxer, the U.S. senator from California, understands why her gay constituents are furious over Rick Warren's role in the inauguration -- it feels like Proposition 8 redux.