
The first-ever congressional hearing on transgender issues was held Thursday in Washington, D.C. The hearing on discrimination against trans people in the workplace was held by the House education and labor subcommittee on health, employment, labor, and pensions, chaired by Democratic congressman Robert Andrews of New Jersey.
This historic hearing was a long time coming, said Rea Carey, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Action Fund. "For far too long, transgender people have lived with the fear of losing their job simply because of who they are," she said. "Today’s hearing marks a critical step in addressing this travesty once and for all."
American Civil Liberties Union senior legislative counsel Christopher Anders echoed Carey’s sentiments. "Regardless of our gender identity, we all deserve a fair shot at job opportunities and advancement," he said. "In America, it should be hard work, education, skills, and experience that determine our success in the job market."
According to Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, the very presence of such a hearing before Congress is cause for celebration. "The idea of Congress holding a hearing [on transgender issues] was a huge long shot," she said. "It shows that Congress understands that this is a significant problem. It’s progress -- it’s not enough progress and it’s not fast enough, but it’s progress."
Based on the testimony of several witnesses, advocacy groups hope Congress will be compelled to pass legislation protecting transgender individuals from discrimination on the job. Among those who testified were Shannon Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, who was one of the attorneys who helped win marriage equality in California; out congresswoman Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin; and retired Army colonel Diane Schroer, whose job offer to be a terrorism research analyst at the Library of Congress was rescinded when her supervisor-to-be learned she had been born male. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.