
Thursday marked the five-year anniversary of the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision allowing consensual gay sex to be decriminalized nationwide. The 6–3 decision in Lawrence v. Texas overturned a Texas law that made it illegal to engage in same-sex sodomy. The court said upholding consensual gay sexual conduct was in line with the U.S. Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment equal-protection clause, since the state didn't prohibit heterosexual sodomy.
The men at the center of the case, John Geddes Lawrence and Tyron Garner, were arrested for sodomy in 1998, fined $200 each, and imprisoned for one night. Police were responding to a call from a disgruntled neighbor who faked a distress call. Police went to the apartment, pushed in the door, and found the two men engaged in anal sex, which was then a punishable offense.
Paul Smith, the attorney who represented the couple, told the Dallas Voice that liberties expanded to gays in the past five years are at least in part a result of the overturning of Texas's sodomy law by the 2003 Lawrence decision.
"I think the amount of progress we have made in the last five years is quite large overall, the progress both culturally and legally," Smith said in the article. "It’s to the point now where we have the Democratic candidate advocating an end to [the federal Defense of Marriage Act] and marriage starting to happen in California, and basically the people in Massachusetts are so used to marriage, it’s not even an issue anymore."
As recently as 1960, all states had a sodomy law, but by 2003, 37 states had repealed the laws or state courts had overturned them. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.