Continental promo
||  News  ||
 
July 01, 2008

Arizona Puts Gay Marriage Ban on Ballot, Again

Arizona voters will decide again in November whether to change the state's constitution to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman.

A 16-4 vote by the state senate on Friday night sends the gay marriage ban to the ballot. It had previously been approved by the house.

Arizona voters rejected a similar state constitutional amendment in 2006. That measure would have also stopped the state from recognizing civil unions of same-sex couples.

Arizona law already prohibits same-sex marriages. Supporters say this proposal would protect the sanctity of families by preventing judges from overturning the 1996 state law.

Sen. Paula Aboud of Tucson, who is gay, accused the amendment's supporters of being "afraid of me and my relationship." (AP)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Paul
    Date posted: 2008-07-01 11:36 PM
    Hometown: Atlanta,Ga

    Comment:

    Are you people SUPRISED ? This is McCains`s home state....


  • Name: Mark
    Date posted: 2008-07-01 12:05 PM
    Hometown: Tampa

    Comment:

    This is disappointing to hear, since AZ voters have already rejected this once. But I'm sure it's because of what happened next door in California. The Religious Wrong will fan hysteria that what happened in CA might spill over into AZ. It's also disappointing because my partner and I have been pursuing jobs in AZ, in hopes of getting the hell out of homophobic Florida! Out of the frying pan and into the fire?


  • Name: Xavier Chapa
    Date posted: 2008-07-01 4:46 AM
    Hometown: Hamburg, Germany

    Comment:

    Dwayne: Of course it doesn't threaten anyone's relationship. Unless, of course they are admitting to have gay tendencies. It's a cover up from the religious right to propagate fear because we all know that you can make lots of money when you rally people on a fear topic. Look at Nazi Germany, The Red Scare, 9/11. It's sick and twisted and that's why Obama's position to leave marriage equality up to the states is a poor policy!


  • Name: Dwayne
    Date posted: 2008-06-30 10:07 PM
    Hometown: Tucson, AZ

    Comment:

    As a gay man, who registered in our city's domestic partnership back in Dec of 2003, I still haven't seen any kind of proof that my relationship will harm straight people's marriages. Yet, we are continually forced to address that fear. Why? Can anyone tell me? Let's all rally and vote on this one more time!!!!


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

Error:Server capacity reached.
Error:Server capacity reached.
Error:Server capacity reached. Subscribe to the digital edition. Subscribe to the print edition.
Error:Server capacity reached.