

The spiritual leader of the world's Anglicans raised questions Monday about the legitimacy of plans to create a global network of conservative Anglicans that would challenge his authority and the teachings of liberal North American churches that are more gay-friendly.
Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said proposals to set up a separate global council of bishops who would train priests and interpret Scripture would create more problems than they would solve.
A council ''which consists of only a self-selected group ... will not pass the test of legitimacy for all in the Communion,'' he said.
Conservative Anglican priests from Africa and some north American and British churches held a conference in Jerusalem on Sunday to express their outrage at what they consider a ''false gospel'' in liberal churches.
Long-standing divisions over how Anglicans should interpret Scripture erupted in 2003 when the U.S. Episcopal Church, part of the Anglican movement, consecrated its first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire.
On Monday the head of the U.S. Episcopal Church, Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, said that ''much of the Anglican world must be lamenting the latest emission'' from the Jerusalem conference.
''Anglicanism has always been broader than some find comfortable,'' she said. ''This statement does not represent the end of Anglicanism, merely another chapter in a centuries-old struggle for dominance by those who consider themselves the only true believers.''
The Anglican Communion is a 77 million-member family of churches that trace their roots to the Church of England. It is the third-largest grouping of churches in the world, behind Roman Catholics and Orthodox Christians, and has always held together different views.
As part of their new fellowship, the conservatives said they would continue to take oversight of breakaway churches in the United States and elsewhere who reject their liberal leaders.
Williams warned that their plans to intervene when congregations or priests around the world complain about the teachings of their local bishops would lead to the church being used to settle personal scores.
''How is a bishop or primate in another continent able to discriminate effectively between a genuine crisis of pastoral relationship and theological integrity, and a situation where are underlying nontheological motivations at work?'' he said.
In their official statement from the conference, the conservative groups said they ''do not accept that Anglican identity is determined necessarily through recognition by the archbishop of Canterbury.''
They also called the current setup for the communion, with the archbishop of Canterbury at its center, ''a colonial structure.''
Some of the key conservative bishops plan to attend a smaller conference Tuesday on global Anglicanism and English orthodoxy at the conservative All Souls Church in central London. (Meera Selva, AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.