

The first hearing
in 15 years on the military's controversial "don't
ask, don't tell" policy prohibiting gay and lesbian soldiers
from serving openly was held in the U.S. House of
Representatives Wednesday. The hearing before the
Military Personnel Subcommittee, part of the House
Armed Services Committee, was the first since "don't ask,
don't tell" was enacted in 1993.
The hearing featured five witnesses, three in
favor of repealing the ban (retired Army major general
Vance Coleman, retired Navy captain Joan Darrah, and
retired Marine staff sergeant Eric Alva) and two in
favor of keeping it (Elaine Donnelly, president of the
Center for Military Readiness; and retired Army
sergeant major Brian Jones).
Coleman led off by speaking of his experience as an African-American in segregated units in the 1950s. Darrah spoke of the fear she felt under "don't ask, don't tell," knowing that no matter how good she was at her job, someone could out her at any point and she'd be fired. She recalled being in the Pentagon just minutes before a plane struck it on 9/11, killing several of her colleagues, and how her partner, not listed among her emergency contacts or in any other paperwork, would've been the last to know about Darrah were she among the casualties too.
For his part, Alva, the first American soldier wounded in the Iraq war (and a former Advocate cover man) told of how his colleagues, who knew he was gay, tended to him after he stepped on a land mine. Far from being a threat to unit cohesion -- one of the underlying assumptions of "don't ask, don't tell" -- his sexual orientation, Alva said, didn't matter at all when his fellow soldiers came to his rescue.
On the opposing side, Donnelly articulated various complaints with ending "don't ask, don't tell," including the notion that open service by gays would lower the morale of those members of the military who oppose it. She also referred to a certain "passive-aggressive" look that some gay people give heterosexuals. Jones, meanwhile, expressed concerns about soldiers of the same sex huddling together "skin to skin" to stay warm in freezing temperatures. In those situations, he said, "arousal" would not be acceptable.
Overall, subcommittee members seemed sympathetic to the plight of gay soldiers, and several, like Rep. Susan A. Davis (D-California), the subcommittee's chairwoman, clearly called for repeal. Other members seemed less inclined to overturn the ban, like Rep. John M. McHugh (R-N.Y.).
"By and large, I thought the majority of the members, the majority of the [witnesses], focused on the real issues," Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, said afterward. "We had differences, but by the end of the day, it was a terrific beginning for us in the House and the Senate."
Sarvis added that
he expects more hearings on "don't ask, don't tell" in
both chambers of the next Congress starting in 2009 and
expressed his belief that the policy will be repealed at
that time. "I believe the votes are gettable and
that this thing can be won, and I think it can be won
in the next Congress," Sarvis said.
A House bill to repeal "don't ask, don't tell"
currently has 143 cosponsors. A companion
bill in the Senate has not yet been
introduced. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.