
The Massachusetts house of representatives has given its initial approval to a bill that would require all future legislation be written in language that is gender-neutral.
The one-paragraph bill says legislation should contain non-gendered phrases such as "he/she" or "his/her," instead of following past practice and using the masculine pronoun by default.
The legislation was inspired when Rep. Cory Atkins, a Democrat, read a bill related to nursing more than a year ago and noticed all the masculine pronouns.
"If you're a guy, you think this is no big deal. And if you're a woman, you're insulted, considering we're 52% of the population," said Atkins.
Atkins still remembers how incredulous she was to read masculine pronouns in a bill related to nursing.
"I thought I must have picked up the wrong legislation because it was all 'he' this, 'he' that, when nursing is predominantly a female profession," she said.
Other states have adopted a similar practice, and at least a half-dozen have amended their constitutions to install gender-neutral language.
Maine changed its drafting standards in 1988 to adopt gender-neutral language, with exceptions for bills singling out men or women in some context. The standards also offer a series of preferred terms to avoid gendered language.
"Alderman," for example, is replaced by "municipal officer."
A law professor said the proposed change is part of a trend in the business and legal professions. It's been propelled, in part, by the rise of female executives.
"There are a lot more women attorneys today than there were 20 or 30 years ago. And there are a lot more men than there were 20 or 30 years ago who would be offended if they thought something was targeted at men only instead of men and women," said Richard Bales, a professor at the Northern Kentucky University law school who has written on the topic.
Bales added: "You should avoid even the possibility of offending someone by redrafting the language. It's not that hard to do."
The Massachusetts bill was sent to the Committee on Bills in the Third Reading on Wednesday, meaning it could come back for a vote before the full chamber at any time. Members expect support in the senate, where Therese Murray serves as the first female president in the chamber's history. (AP)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.