Health Promo 03 (Getty) | Advocate.com
||  News  ||
 
August 19, 2008

Gay-Marriage Opponents Seek to Reinstate 1913 Mass. Law

Gay-Marriage Opponents Seek to Reinstate 1913 Mass. Law

The gay marriage fight in Massachusetts might not be over after all. Opponents of same-sex marriages are seeking a ballot question that would prevent gay and lesbian couples from getting married in the state if their union wouldn't be legal in their home state.

Brian Camenker of the group Mass Resistance said Friday that lawmakers and Gov. Deval Patrick bowed to the will of the "gay lobby" last month by approving the repeal of a 1913 statute that banned such marriages.

Patrick, the state's first black governor and the father of a daughter who recently announced she's a lesbian, said the 1913 law had racial undertones from a period when interracial marriage was discouraged.

"The legislature and the governor changed our marriage laws to please the well-connected minority and force a social experiment into other states that's very offensive to a majority of the people, at least the way the votes have been going," Camenker said, referring to recent votes in favor of gay marriage bans in other states.

He was particularly critical of an emergency preamble attached to the repeal. It bypassed a normal 90-day waiting period and made the law effective immediately. Opponents typically use the 90 days to present signatures and delay the law until it can be put to a ballot vote.

"The fact that this happened the way it happened just adds to the sense of sleaziness and underhandedness of the whole process," Camenker said.

The group will need about 32,000 signatures to get its question on the ballot.

Gay marriage advocates who had celebrated the repeal said they were disappointed but not surprised by the petition.

"I've learned that when it comes to equality for gay and lesbian people, the struggle is never over because there are certain people that are just strongly opposed to any rights for gay people. It's never shocking; it is disappointing," said Marc Solomon of MassEquality.

Gay Massachusetts residents have been allowed to legally marry since 2004. Opponents, such as former governor Mitt Romney, said the 1913 law prevented Massachusetts from becoming the "Las Vegas of same-sex marriage." California also permits same-sex marriage and has no restriction on out-of-state couples.

Mass Resistance filed paperwork with the secretary of state's office on Wednesday. The measure has been forwarded to the attorney general's office for review.

The state constitution prohibits referendum questions on subjects that relate to religion, judges, the courts, particular localities of the commonwealth, state appropriations, and certain provisions of the constitution's Declaration of Rights. State attorney general Martha Coakley has 14 days to review the proposed question. (Glen Johnson, AP)

Keywords:  marriage 
© 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Ginelle
    Date posted: 2008-08-19 11:33 AM
    Hometown: British Columbia, Canada

    Comment:

    It is so unfortunate that some of these groups or individuals are so obsessed with hatred towards the Gay and Lesbian Community that they will do anything to impede the progress of equal rights. Like a mad dog with a bone, they will do anything to ensure that their agendas are literally forced down everyone's throat without consideration at all for individual rights and freedoms. With their obsessive behaviours, they have lost their ability to be human, to reason in a sane and sensible manner. I don't believe that I could be far from wrong in thinking that with this extreme obsessiveness might lead to some mental health issues for some of these people. So do we continue to give these people a platform from which to spew their hatred and venom, or do we turn the cheek, as Jesus Christ did, and just ignore them. My take would be to just ignore them, how far can they go without an audience?


  • Name: NORMA
    Date posted: 2008-08-19 8:51 AM
    Hometown: NEW YORK

    Comment:

    I THINK THAT WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO MARRY WHOM EVER WE CHOOSE AND BE TREATED EGUAL ITS NOT FAIR AT ALL HOW WE GET TREATED BECAUSE OF WHO WE LOVE. WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO EGUAL RIGHTS?


  • Name: michael
    Date posted: 2008-08-18 11:19 PM
    Hometown: boston

    Comment:

    Oh, this Brian Camenker is a real nut job. "MassResistance"... a fringe hate group with one member (Brian). Why is he getting any attention at all? Search for his appearance on The Daily Show (in 2005, I think). During the "interview", it was clear what a nut he is. He's absolutely obsessed about homosexuals.


  • Name: Art M.
    Date posted: 2008-08-18 8:59 PM
    Hometown: SF, CA, USA

    Comment:

    j.e.green wrote: "secure the White House with a DEMOCRATIC win" Uh - sorry to have to break this to you j.e., but Obama is NOT a fan of same-sex marriage, and has gone on record in an interview with the Chicago Daily Tribune, Obama said, "I'm a Christian. And so, although I try not to have my religious beliefs dominate or determine my political views on this issue, I do believe that tradition, and my religious beliefs say that marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman." You might not want to hear that truth - but it's there. He's courted us - but then he's said things like that. He's ACTIVELY courting the religious right NOW! Wonder what he's telling them about how he'll treat gays?


  • Name: Roger Burr
    Date posted: 2008-08-18 4:57 PM
    Hometown: Marble Hill, MO

    Comment:

    I'm confident any attempt to re-instate the 1913 law will meet with failure. The law was intended as an anti-miscegenation measure; something no longer an issue in todays society. Those who are against same-sex marriage are trying to say that marriages not recognized as lawful in other states; should not be performed in Massachusetts. If that were the case, then ANY same-sex marriage performed in Massachusetts, even among their own residents, would not be permitted under the 1913 law, as such marriages are not universally recognized throughout the country. This antiquated law has been disposed of, and should stay that way!


  • Name: Don Charles
    Date posted: 2008-08-18 12:42 PM
    Hometown: Kansas City

    Comment:

    Well, people elected Democrats hoping to end the war in Iraq, but look what happened . . . several war funding bills passed with overwhelming Democratic support. And have you forgotten the broken promises of Bill Clinton vis a vis the military ban? Don't put our movement's success in the hands of ANY politician, Democrat or Republican! That's naive. It's up to the people in the streets to pressure power brokers for progressive change. That's the only way lasting change will happen.


  • Name: j.e. green author of MERGING WITH MONSTERS
    Date posted: 2008-08-18 11:11 AM
    Hometown: Denver, Colorado

    Comment:

    It's UGLY shenanigans like this that makes it MORE IMPORTANT than ever before that we unite our voices: secure the White House with a DEMOCRATIC win; defeat evil initiatives such as this one proposed in MA, and CA! Indeed, the STRUGGLE is never over! Peace Out!


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • Letter From the Editor
    We’d like to unveil a big change: after nearly four decades as a biweekly magazine, we’re going monthly.
  • Parental Control
    San Francisco State researcher Caitlin Ryan explains the importance behind a study linking suicide and drug use among gay children to parental rejection.
  • Austerity Chic
    How novelist and performance artist Mike Albo gets by in lean times.
  • Hoping to "Wu" Michelle
    Dressing Michelle Obama in November was a game changer for designer Jason Wu. Now he has his sights set on the future first lady’s most high-profile event: Inauguration Day.
  • Boi From Troy Signs Off
    After five years of raising eyebrows on the Web, Boi From Troy blogger -- and gay Republican -- Scott Schmidt is signing off.
  • A Desert Journey
    The Mii Amo spa in Sedona, Ariz., is famous for packages designed to lead people through a spiritual as well as physical transformation. One writer relinquishes herself to the journey and recounts her days in one of the world's most beautiful destination resorts.
  • A List: Chris Evans
    Chris Evans is a serious actor but that doesn’t mean he wants you to stop objectifying him.
  • Great American Couple
    In an exclusive excerpt from his new book, Hollywood Bohemians: Transgressive Sexuality and the Selling of the Movieland Dream, Brett L. Abrams explores the relationship between Cary Grant and Randolph Scott, who led homosexual lives right under everyone's nose.
  • Mormons Gone Wild
    After one man undresses missionaries for his calendar, LDS Church–owned Brigham Young University strips him of his degree.
  • Constructive Impatience
    Stung by the Warren decision, GLAAD's former executive director Joan Garry offers the Obama transition team some sage advice.
  • Boxer Goes Trans for Eli Stone
    Often perceived as male by confused casting agents, boxer-body builder turned actor Dallas Malloy felt a deep connection to the trans minister she plays on Eli Stone.
  • Mamma Mia! Rises Again
    Meryl Streep and company managed to top Harry Potter and Titanic at the U.K. box office, and now Mamma Mia! is poised to break similar records on DVD. Director Phyllida Lloyd talked to Advocate.com about bringing one of the biggest musicals of all time to the big screen.
  • The Other White Meat
    As one of the subjects of the documentary about the drag pageant circuit, Pageant, opening in select theaters, and one of the contestants on RuPaul's Drag Race, premiering next month on Logo, Victoria "Porkchop" Parker may not look or act like your typical female impersonator, but make no mistake, she is one of the best.
  • The Religious Defense
    In an excerpt from her new book, Bulletproof Faith: A Spiritual Survival Guide for Gay and Lesbian Christians, author Candace Chellew-Hodge incorporates the wisdom of Xena: Warrior Princess to illustrate her theories as to how gay and lesbian people of faith can protect themselves from those who attack their views.
  • Photo Finish
    Did Prop. 8 backlash cause art censorship -- or its reversal -- at Brigham Young University? Could be, as BYU photography student J. Michael Wiltbank found when his contribution to a two-week-long art exhibition -- eight pairs of benign portraits, each depicting an LGBT-identified BYU student alongside a supportive friend -- had been removed.
  • The Divine Miss M.
    Since the death of performer Wayland Flowers in 1988, his over-the-top puppet creation Madame has been seen only sporadically. But with the launch of her new casino tour, Madame is back.
  • Whither NLGJA?
    The leading professional organization for LGBT journalists is facing a crisis that threatens its very survival. In a changing media landscape and a tough economy, how does a small nonprofit live up to its mission and retain members?
  • The Road to Equality
    Barbara Boxer, the U.S. senator from California, understands why her gay constituents are furious over Rick Warren's role in the inauguration -- it feels like Proposition 8 redux.