
A transgender woman who was denied a job opportunity at the Library of Congress testified Tuesday in the U.S. district court in Washington, D.C. A Library of Congress official had initially offered the position of terrorism research analyst to 52-year-old Diane Schroer, who was considered a star applicant. But in December 2004, the day after Schroer told her prospective boss she was making the transition to become a woman, the job offer was rescinded, according to The Washington Post.
Schroer, who was then known as David, had retired from the Army as a special forces commander. Before that she had been director of a classified organization formed to track and target international terrorists following the attacks of September 11; she regularly briefed Vice President Dick Cheney and other top federal officials.
"[E]very day, I wish the phone rang and they said, 'We made a mistake,'" she said at the trial on Tuesday.
The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit in 2005 on Schroer's behalf. She still wants the job as well as damages, which are legally capped at $300,000.
The suit is based on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which the Library of Congress argues does not protect Schroer because the act does not protect transgender people from discrimination on the basis of gender identity. The U.S. Justice Department is representing the Library of Congress.
Charlotte Preece, Schroer's once-prospective supervisor, said she worried the transition would distract her from her work. However, Schroer said her transition has helped her focus even more. According to her testimony, Schroer started a consulting firm and has contracts with several federal agencies including the U.S. Coast Guard and the Department of Defense.
"If anything, since my transition, things have been a lot clearer," Schroer said. "It feels like a big distraction has been removed from my life." (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
Be the first to comment on this story.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.