

After narrowly missing out on qualifying for the three-meter springboard finals earlier this week, out Australian diver Matthew Mitcham took home the gold in the 10-meter platform competition, preventing the Chinese from taking gold in all eight diving categories.
According to the Los Angeles Times, Mitcham bounced back with an impeccably timed final dive in last night’s competition, earning four perfect 10's from the judges, pulling ahead of the competition’s favored winner, Chinese diver Zhou Luxin.
Luxin had been leading Mitcham going into last night’s finals by more than 30 points. But he faltered on his last dive, blowing his entry, according to the Times, and giving Mitcham an opportunity to clinch the gold.
"It's going to take a while to sink in," Mitcham told the Associated Press, fighting back tears. "My cheeks hurt from smiling. My face hurts from the chlorine. My legs are sore from jumping up and down. I'm in pain and I'm tired. But I'm so happy."
The win marks a huge turnaround for the 20-year-old Australian diver, who earlier this week finished 16th out of 18 competitors in the three-meter semifinals.
Mitcham is the first openly gay Australian to compete in the Olympics. His coming-out was well documented in the Australian press when he applied for financial aide to help pay for his boyfriend to join him in Beijing for the Games.
“I just want to be known as the Australian diver who did really well at the Olympics,” Mitcham told The Advocate in an interview with the magazine last month. “It’s everybody else who thinks it’s special when homosexuality and elite sport go together.”
Click here to read The Advocate's cover story. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
Comments that do not concern specific articles in The Advocate or on Advocate.com will not be posted or published. See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.