

For the first time, the New York City health department has issued a study that is able to determine the number of new infections of HIV in a year. The study, which reports on 2006, is the most precise estimate ever of citywide HIV infections, according to the health department.
In previous years, findings have been able to track the number of new diagnoses in a test year, but results haven’t been able to distinguish new infections from those that occurred in earlier years.
The latest study further confirms previous findings that have placed the average of new HIV infections in New York far higher than the national average.
Director of HIV epidemiology Beth Begier says the study’s latest findings will help New Yorkers have a more accurate understanding of what they’re faced with.“Having a number is helpful,” Begier explains. “It’s another way to let people know that New Yorkers are at higher risk and to urge them to take the necessary precautions.”
The 2006 study finds that 72 of every 100,000 New Yorkers were newly infected that year, compared to 23 of every 100,000 people nationally. Begier says the average is higher in a city like New York in part because of the city’s diverse population as well as its being one of the first places the HIV epidemic showed up.
“It’s really two issues. One, we have more of our population at risk compared with other parts of the country," Begier adds. "We have more men who have sex with men. Additionally, we’ve had the epidemic longer than some parts of the country. Some of New York’s groups have become highly affected, so it’s continued to spread.”
The latest findings will assist the health department in its continued outreach efforts throughout New York City, including condom distribution, a grassroots online campaign aimed at gay men, and its most recent undertaking, an effort to get every all Bronx residents to learn their HIV status.
For more information on the latest New York statistics, visit www.CDC.gov. (The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.