Health Promo 03 (Getty) | Advocate.com
||  News  ||
 
September 03, 2008

Log Cabin Republicans Endorse McCain for President

Log Cabin Republicans Endorse McCain for President

Pointing to his decision to break from the Republican majority and speak out against a federal amendment banning same-sex marriage, the Log Cabin Republicans on Tuesday officially endorsed John McCain for president. Log Cabin president Patrick Sammon announced the endorsement to a little over 200 attendees of the Big Tent Event at the Republican National Convention.

Log Cabin had indicated that gay marriage would be a hot-button issue for the group this election season, and Sammon later told The Advocate that McCain’s opposition to a U.S. constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage was enough to warrant an endorsement.

"Senator McCain stood with our community during its most critical attack in the last 10 years," Sammon said, referring to the Federal Marriage Amendment, "something it would have taken 100 years to fix in our Constitution. And Senator McCain paid a political price for that. He is distrusted by social conservatives in part because of his vote against the amendment. So we thought it was important to show our support for him because he stood with us."

Log Cabin's board of directors voted 12–2 in favor of the endorsement, and Sammon said he had "no illusions" that many LGBT activists would disagree with the decision. "It was not a rubber stamp. There was a lot of good discussion over the recent months -- a lot of soul-searching, a lot of honest deliberation," he said.

Sammon noted that LCR's membership largely favored the endorsement and added that he deemed it a strategic imperative for the gay community overall. "There's a 40% to 50% chance John McCain will win this election and I think it's important to have a strong voice that goes in and makes the case for him to support the issues that we care so much about. The fact is, John McCain is no George Bush on these issues." LCR endorsed then–Governor Bush in the 2000 election but declined to endorse him for reelection in 2004 based largely on President Bush's support for the Federal Marriage Amendment.

While McCain has said he supports the definition of marriage as being between a man and a woman and he advocated for passage of his own state's marriage ban in 2006, he has said that a federal ban on gay marriage is “un-Republican.” In 2004 he broke from the Bush administration and condemned the proposed amendment, saying he felt the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act was a more appropriate measure.

McCain's vice-presidential pick, Alaska governor Sarah Palin, a Christian conservative, has also gone on the record as saying she is against same-sex marriage and for defining marriage as being between a man and a woman, adding that she supported passing the state's constitutional marriage amendment in 1998.

She has, however, received some credit from gay voters for vetoing a law that would have denied health care and retiree benefits to the partners of gay state employees, according to the Anchorage Daily News. Palin vetoed the law based on a recommendation from the Alaska attorney general that it was unconstitutional. But she indicated that she did not personally support extending domestic-partner benefits to same-sex couples and backed a state amendment to repeal the Alaska supreme court's decision. 

Sammon acknowledged that Log Cabin Republicans disagree with some of Governor Palin's positions, but added, "A lot of social conservatives were pressuring her to sign that legislation and she vetoed it, which had the effect of providing domestic-partner benefits." He also said Palin has not used gay issues in her campaigns in order to get elected in the same way that politicians like Mitt Romney have. (Kerry Eleveld, The Advocate)

Keywords:  2008 Election 

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Bonnie Earle
    Date posted: 2008-09-09 11:54 AM
    Hometown: Clearwater

    Comment:

    I am so very disgusted with the Log Cabin people. Why Republican? Cause Gays and Lesbians are only interested in WHAT???? Money. Do you all realize McCain's running mate attends a church which prays over gays and lesbians and makes then "straight & probably perfect." My daughter is Gay and I would not change one thing about her. God help anyone who prays for her to change. GLAD must be so disappointed in your organization. I amonly one mother --- one person -- BUT I can assure you I will announce to the world that you are supporting McCain with his "Super duper" prayer person. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU ALL????? Can't you even support and help others who have a different sexual orientation - due to mo fault of their own. PLEASE do attend Phyllis's church so you can all be "normal" Bonnie F Earle --- PROUD PROUD mother of my daughter and all her gay friends....


  • Name: Ronald
    Date posted: 2008-09-04 3:41 AM
    Hometown: Honolulu

    Comment:

    Endorsements are lame. Those that follow them are too lazy to do their own policy research and would rather follow the leader like a bunch of cows. And, for the record our wonderful HRC endorses a candidate who doesn't support full marriage rights for the LGBT community. In my eyes, their endorsement is just as useless as this one.


  • Name: Robert Frost
    Date posted: 2008-09-03 10:41 PM
    Hometown: Phoenix

    Comment:

    To Andrew in Irving, TX. John McCain had everything to do with the 2006 Gay Marriage Proposition in AZ. He appeared in TV commercials urging voters to pass the proposition and VOTE YES. John McCain is solidly in favor of gay marriage amendments. The 2006 proposition would have would have amended the AZ Constitution to ban domestic partnerships as well as gay marriage. That vote by the people wasn’t good enough for the right wing, theocratic Christianists. During the last few minutes of the 2008 legislative session, the repugnican controlled legislature, by shutting off the microphones of the 2 Democrats who had the floor and in violation of Senate rules, voted to put the issue once again on the November ballot. This time, the proposition is much more narrow and will attempt to amend the Constitution to define marriage as only between a man and a woman. I would suggest that before you post a comment, you check your facts to make sure they are correct.


  • Name: Colin V. Gallagher
    Date posted: 2008-09-03 8:33 PM
    Hometown: San Francisco

    Comment:

    This endorsement is distressing, given that McCain has said that he would support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to ban same-sex marriage if there were a successful challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act. As a gay Republican and past San Francisco LCR President, I strongly approved of the decision in 2004 to withhold the endorsement of Bush's re-election. Nothing that has happened since then has caused me to question the wisdom of that decision, whatever the short-term cost was to LCR's lobbying in terms of access to the Bush Administration. If the LCR leaders think that McCain, who endorsed Proposition 8 in California, would actually be a better President for the lesbian and gay community than Obama, who has opposed Prop. 8, then they are deluded. McCain's picks to the Supreme Court would likely vote to recriminalize sodomy. Because of this decision, I will likely never contribute again to the Log Cabin organization, either on the state or federal level.


  • Name: Jason
    Date posted: 2008-09-03 4:24 PM
    Hometown: Phoenix

    Comment:

    I meant to say that I am NOT putting down LCRs as people. That was a typo as I forgot to put the word "not" there. Only that I do not understand them. That's all...


  • Name: Jason
    Date posted: 2008-09-03 4:18 PM
    Hometown: Phoenix

    Comment:

    I do my best to understand where various ideological groups come from. I make an effort to see the reasoning behind those individuals who believe differently from me. However, for a gay person wanting or claiming to be a Republican is synonymous with a Jewish person wanting to join the Nazi Party or an African-American wanting to join the Ku Klux Klan. I am sorry but...that is how much sense a gay person makes to want to join or affiliate with the GOP. Frankly it is near traitorous. I have never understood why a person who affiliates with a demographic, through no fault of their own, would want to join a group, out of choice, that is against your demographic. I am a fairly educated person but this makes no sense to me whatsoever. I am putting down LCRs as people but I believe that their energies are misused and misdirected as well.


  • Name: Roger Burr
    Date posted: 2008-09-03 1:44 PM
    Hometown: Marble Hill, MO

    Comment:

    This makes about as much sense as German jews endorsing Adolf Hitler. Referring to the Log Cabin Republicans, I am reminded of what a comedian once said; "You can't fix STUPID"....


  • Name: Joe
    Date posted: 2008-09-03 12:36 PM
    Hometown: Fort Worth

    Comment:

    I take issue with those who call the LCRs "self-hating" or "self-loathing" - they are nothing of the sort. Instead, they love themselves (or, rather, their pocketbooks) more than they care for others.


  • Name: Chris Sullivan
    Date posted: 2008-09-03 12:05 PM
    Hometown: Chicago, IL

    Comment:

    Patrick Sammon is a classic example of a self-deluisional, self-loathing homosexual. His spin on McCain would be amusing if not so tragic.


  • Name: Chris Sullivan
    Date posted: 2008-09-03 12:01 PM
    Hometown: Chicago, IL

    Comment:

    "Gay Republicans" ? What about "Jews for Hitler"? or "Backs for the KKK" they all amount to the same thing. Maybe they can get these Log Cabin Republicans to turn the ovens on. Nothing but a bunch of self-loathing homosexuals. Pathetic.


  • Name: Jonathan
    Date posted: 2008-09-03 1:51 AM
    Hometown: Phoenix

    Comment:

    Although all American's may vote whichever way their conscience allows, one has to question the logic behind a homosexual selecting someone who has not openly supported GBLT people in the past, regardless of their fiscal leanings. Working within a group to change it only works when that group works in unison with the effort, rather than consistently fighting against said effort. The Log Cabin Republicans should be working with the Democrat party to move their fiscal agenda more toward conservative monetary responsibility rather than attempting to move a group from one moral stance to another. Ideals which are moral in basis are far more difficult to transition than those based on discordant monetary policy.


  • Name: Michelle Adams and Diane Roznik
    Date posted: 2008-09-03 1:19 AM
    Hometown: Ellensburg

    Comment:

    Who are the Log Cabin Republicans trying to fool by endorsing McCain/Palin—themselves? The rest of us live in a state of reality, what state do they live in? In their state, do they get Social Security benefits when their partner dies? Do they get medical coverage through their partner? Do they enjoy paying more taxes because health benefits are counted as gross income? Can they adopt children or be a foster parent? Can they visit their spouses in every hospital in the U.S. without fear of being turned away by a McCain supporter....oh, wait, most of us can't get married so we don't have a “spouse.” McCain & Palin would rather we have partners, best friends, roommates, and draw up legal papers. We are spouses whether McCain and Palin believe our relationships deserve equal status or not. Log Cabin Republican’s may not think their relationships are worth fighting for, but ours is. Log Cabin Republicans, “What state do you live in?”


  • Name: Scott
    Date posted: 2008-09-03 1:16 AM
    Hometown: Sydney

    Comment:

    Log Cabin Republicans. If you truly believe that the Party you belong to stands up for gay rights, lets see the speeches at the convention saying so. If John McCain and Sarah Palin do not do so then the gay community knows the Evangelicals have vice hold grip on the party. My suggestion is go join Ron Paul's Republicans.


  • Name: Terri
    Date posted: 2008-09-02 9:02 PM
    Hometown: Atlanta

    Comment:

    Liar! The old gasbag makes me sick.


  • Name: Jonathan
    Date posted: 2008-09-02 7:46 PM
    Hometown: Lewiston, ME

    Comment:

    This is another example of a "so-called" gay rights organization practicing the old art of hyprocrisy. Selling out to the highest bidder, casting true values aside in favor of partisan politics and the all mighty dollar. What was the final asking price? The HRC, The LCR, and even the Matthew Shepard Foundation all abandon principle in favor of the all mighty dollar and are pure examples of hypocrisy. They are really no better than the AFA, FRC and the CC in the way they do their business. Quite honestly though, I'd rather be hated to my face, than hated behind my back. I don't do community service work on behalf of any GLBT campaigns or political campaigns anymore. Its a sellout, no matter which way you look at it.


  • Name: rgm
    Date posted: 2008-09-02 7:11 PM
    Hometown: wdc

    Comment:

    How pathetic once again the Log Cabin Republicans have no issues of being treated as second class citizens. Let’s review John McCain’s record on gay rights. He has endorsed the repeal of gay marriages in CA and he boasts of his support for his home state’s efforts to ban not only gay marriage but ANY form of same-sex couples recognition - including domestic partnerships. He supports Don’t Ask Don’t Tell and does NOT support the Mathew Shepard Act (hate crimes legislation). On the issue of gay adoptions he stated in July, “I think that we’ve proven that both parents are important in the success of a family so, no I don’t believe in gay adoption.” Senator McCain also supported a Jesse Helms strategy to cut off AIDS funding for prevention efforts aimed at the gay community. And last but not least it was none other than John McCain who cast the deciding vote against the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA).


  • Name: E Rojas
    Date posted: 2008-09-02 6:58 PM
    Hometown: Anchorage

    Comment:

    The Log Cabin Republicans failed to mentioned that John McCain is in favor of both state constitutional amendments to take away gay marriage in California and ban it in Florida. As for Gov. Palin, she has never been a friend to the LGBT community in Alaska. She signed off on an Advisory vote that if passed by a large majority would have "advised" the legislature to place a constitutional amendment that would have taken away domestic partnership benefits from state LGBT workers. Luckily, the advisory barely passed which didn't give right wing legislator's enough ammunition to call for the constitutional amendment on the ballot. The Log Cabin Republicans again have done a disservice to the LGBT community and the movement.


  • Name: Mark Thomas
    Date posted: 2008-09-02 6:56 PM
    Hometown: Wappingers Falls

    Comment:

    McCain is against ending Don't Ask, Don't Tell and DOMA. Obama is for ending those unconstitutional discriminatory horrible laws that have cost the country millions of dollars and weakened our military and families. Obama is for a federal equal rights amendment and hate crime legislation including sexual orientation, and McCain is not. McCain wants an all conservative, anti-gay Supreme Court. Obama wants the opposite. 72-year-old McCain is not mentally or physically fit to be president. The Log Cabin Republicans obviously are self-hating, insane, self-destructive lunatics who should not be permitted to vote.


  • Name: Andrew
    Date posted: 2008-09-02 6:50 PM
    Hometown: Irving, TX

    Comment:

    McCain represents the only state in the country where voters, when given the opportunity, have voted against a measure to define marriage as one man and one woman. I doubt Senator McCain had anything to do with that. In fact, I doubt he cares about gay marriage at all. Remember, these are politicians--They will say ANYTHING to get elected.--- Watch what they DO, and pay less attention to what they SAY. (example: Sara Palin).


  • Name: Joshua Layne
    Date posted: 2008-09-02 5:54 PM
    Hometown: Murfreesboro

    Comment:

    Log cabin republicans are usually self loathing creatures who dont care about anyone but themselves. Ive had experience. I like to give people a chance and try really hard not to generalize a group of people with ideas but after dating 6 of these idiots (joy of beng in the south) I have given up on anyone calling themselves a Log cabin republican. Wouldnt it be such a joke, if it was'nt so damn sad.


  • Name: Sara
    Date posted: 2008-09-02 5:06 PM
    Hometown: Atlanta

    Comment:

    McCain has flip-flopped on so many different things in the last year alone that I can't believe they would endorse him on something he said 4 YEARS AGO? Palin only vetoed that bill because it was unconstitutional, and even said that she supported it and wished she didn't have to veto it. Log Cabin Republicans need to go back ino their self-hating closets of shame and stop screwing things up by trying to get these people elected!!


  • Name: Daniel
    Date posted: 2008-09-02 4:01 PM
    Hometown: Philly

    Comment:

    Give me a break! Sure, McCain opposed the Federal Marriage Amendment, but he fully supports state-level constitutional bans of same-sex marriage and has indeed spoken in support of efforts to reverse same-sex marriage rights in California. His federalist beliefs are noted, but meaningless. The bottom line is that he still backs banning same-sex marriage. Once again the Log Cabin Republicans are pulling out the most tenuous rationalizations to justify their support for a politician (and party) that is expressly out to deny gays equal rights.


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • Letter From the Editor
    We’d like to unveil a big change: after nearly four decades as a biweekly magazine, we’re going monthly.
  • Parental Control
    San Francisco State researcher Caitlin Ryan explains the importance behind a study linking suicide and drug use among gay children to parental rejection.
  • Austerity Chic
    How novelist and performance artist Mike Albo gets by in lean times.
  • Hoping to "Wu" Michelle
    Dressing Michelle Obama in November was a game changer for designer Jason Wu. Now he has his sights set on the future first lady’s most high-profile event: Inauguration Day.
  • Boi From Troy Signs Off
    After five years of raising eyebrows on the Web, Boi From Troy blogger -- and gay Republican -- Scott Schmidt is signing off.
  • A Desert Journey
    The Mii Amo spa in Sedona, Ariz., is famous for packages designed to lead people through a spiritual as well as physical transformation. One writer relinquishes herself to the journey and recounts her days in one of the world's most beautiful destination resorts.
  • A List: Chris Evans
    Chris Evans is a serious actor but that doesn’t mean he wants you to stop objectifying him.
  • Great American Couple
    In an exclusive excerpt from his new book, Hollywood Bohemians: Transgressive Sexuality and the Selling of the Movieland Dream, Brett L. Abrams explores the relationship between Cary Grant and Randolph Scott, who led homosexual lives right under everyone's nose.
  • Mormons Gone Wild
    After one man undresses missionaries for his calendar, LDS Church–owned Brigham Young University strips him of his degree.
  • Constructive Impatience
    Stung by the Warren decision, GLAAD's former executive director Joan Garry offers the Obama transition team some sage advice.
  • Boxer Goes Trans for Eli Stone
    Often perceived as male by confused casting agents, boxer-body builder turned actor Dallas Malloy felt a deep connection to the trans minister she plays on Eli Stone.
  • Mamma Mia! Rises Again
    Meryl Streep and company managed to top Harry Potter and Titanic at the U.K. box office, and now Mamma Mia! is poised to break similar records on DVD. Director Phyllida Lloyd talked to Advocate.com about bringing one of the biggest musicals of all time to the big screen.
  • The Other White Meat
    As one of the subjects of the documentary about the drag pageant circuit, Pageant, opening in select theaters, and one of the contestants on RuPaul's Drag Race, premiering next month on Logo, Victoria "Porkchop" Parker may not look or act like your typical female impersonator, but make no mistake, she is one of the best.
  • The Religious Defense
    In an excerpt from her new book, Bulletproof Faith: A Spiritual Survival Guide for Gay and Lesbian Christians, author Candace Chellew-Hodge incorporates the wisdom of Xena: Warrior Princess to illustrate her theories as to how gay and lesbian people of faith can protect themselves from those who attack their views.
  • Photo Finish
    Did Prop. 8 backlash cause art censorship -- or its reversal -- at Brigham Young University? Could be, as BYU photography student J. Michael Wiltbank found when his contribution to a two-week-long art exhibition -- eight pairs of benign portraits, each depicting an LGBT-identified BYU student alongside a supportive friend -- had been removed.
  • The Divine Miss M.
    Since the death of performer Wayland Flowers in 1988, his over-the-top puppet creation Madame has been seen only sporadically. But with the launch of her new casino tour, Madame is back.
  • Whither NLGJA?
    The leading professional organization for LGBT journalists is facing a crisis that threatens its very survival. In a changing media landscape and a tough economy, how does a small nonprofit live up to its mission and retain members?
  • The Road to Equality
    Barbara Boxer, the U.S. senator from California, understands why her gay constituents are furious over Rick Warren's role in the inauguration -- it feels like Proposition 8 redux.