GOP Campaign Downplays Palin Book-Banning Inquiry

The McCain campaign is defending Alaska governor Sarah Palin's much-criticized inquiry into banning books at her hometown library, saying her questions were only hypothetical.

Shortly after taking office in 1996 as mayor of Wasilla, a city of about 10,000 people, Palin asked the city's head librarian about banning books. Later, the librarian was notified by Palin that she was being fired, although Palin backed off under pressure.

Palin alleged attempt at book-banning has been a matter of intense interest since Republican presidential nominee John McCain named her as his running mate last month.

Taylor Griffin, a spokesman for the McCain campaign, said Thursday that Palin asked the head librarian, Mary Ellen Emmons, on three occasions how she would react to attempts at banning books. He said the questions, in the fall of 1996, were hypothetical and entirely appropriate. He said a patron had asked the library to remove a title the year before and the mayor wanted to understand how such disputes were handled.

Records on the city's website, however, do not show any books were challenged in Wasilla in the 10 years before Palin took office.

Palin notified Emmons she would be fired in January 1997 because the mayor didn't feel she had the librarian's ''full support.'' Emmons was reinstated the next day after public outcry, according to newspaper reports at the time.

Still, one longtime library staffer recalls that the run-in made everyone fear for their jobs.

''Mayor Palin gave us some terrible moments and some rather gut-wrenching moments, particularly when Mary Ellen said she was going to have to leave,'' said Cathy Petrie, who managed the children's collection at the time.

Recent outrage has been fueled by Wasilla housewife Anne Kilkenny, whose 2,400-word critique of Palin's legacy as mayor is widely posted on the Internet. Kilkenny described Palin's actions as ''out-and-out censorship.''

But the McCain campaign, in a statement, said the charge ''is categorically false ... Governor Sarah Palin has never asked anyone to ban a book, period.''

Emmons, a former Alaska Library Association president who now goes by Mary Ellen Baker, did not return calls seeking comment.

According to the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman newspaper, Emmons did not mince words when Palin asked her ''how I would deal with her saying a book can't be in the library'' on October 28, 1996, in a week when the mayor had asked department heads for letters of resignation.

''She asked me if I would object to censorship, and I replied 'Yup,''' Emmons told a reporter. ''And I told her it would not be just me. This was a constitutional question, and the American Civil Liberties Union would get involved too.''

The Reverend Howard Bess, a liberal Christian preacher in the nearby town of Palmer, said the church Palin and her family attended until 2002, the Wasilla Assembly of God, was pushing to remove his book from local bookstores.

Emmons told him that year that several copies of Pastor, I Am Gay had disappeared from the library shelves, Bess said.

''Sarah brought pressure on the library about things she didn't like,'' Bess said. ''To believe that my book was not targeted in this is a joke.''

Other locals said the dustup had been blown out of proportion.

''That was many years ago and Sarah never had any intention to ban books,'' said David Chappel, who served as Palin's deputy mayor for three years. ''There were some vocal people in the minority, and it looks like they're still out there.''

Jim Rettig, a University of Richmond librarian who heads the Chicago-based American Library Association, suggested that the lingering quarrel raises issues that are still relevant as librarians prepare to celebrate Banned Books Week later this month.

''Librarians are very committed to the principles of the First Amendment of the Constitution and that means we don't allow one individual or a group of people to dictate what people can or cannot read,'' he said. ''Most librarians, if they got that sort of a question, would be curious as to what the intent of the questioner was.'' (Garance Burke, AP)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

Name: Harry Paratesteise
Date posted: 2008-09-15 6:15 PM
Hometown: Orange County, Kkkalifornia

Comment:

Please, everyone in the Gay Community, your thanks is almost too much for us Log Cabin Republicans! We know how much you owe us for "working from within" to change the Republican Party. We know how much we've done and we know your adulation and praise of us is well deserved - but PLEASE, people, thank us in a more orderly way! We here in the Log Cabin Republicans know how much we've done to further Gay Rights. We've come a long way from the days when Republicans wanted to fire every Gay they could and put us in concentration camps and ban same-sex marriage and ban our books in libraries and stuff like that! THANKS TO OUR EFFORTS, those sorts of things don't go on anymore! Governor Palin just said so!

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

Error:Server capacity reached.

Error:Server capacity reached.