Continental promo
||  News  ||
 
September 30, 2008

Google Comes Out Against California's Proposition 8

Search engine behemoth Google does not typically make political endorsements. But it did recently when company cofounder Sergey Brin made a post on a Google blog Friday that stated opposition to Proposition 8, the ballot measure that could take away same-sex marriage rights in California.

Wrote Brin: "As an Internet company, Google is an active participant in policy debates surrounding information access, technology and energy. Because our company has a great diversity of people and opinions -- Democrats and Republicans, conservatives and liberals, all religions and no religion, straight and gay -- we do not generally take a position on issues outside of our field, especially not social issues. So when Proposition 8 appeared on the California ballot, it was an unlikely question for Google to take an official company position on.

"However, while there are many objections to this proposition -- further government encroachment on personal lives, ambiguously written text -- it is the chilling and discriminatory effect of the proposition on many of our employees that brings Google to publicly oppose Proposition 8. While we respect the strongly held beliefs that people have on both sides of this argument, we see this fundamentally as an issue of equality. We hope that California voters will vote no on Proposition 8 -- we should not eliminate anyone's fundamental rights, whatever their sexuality, to marry the person they love."

Google is headquartered in Mountain View, Calif.

Other media outlets coming out against Proposition 8 include The New York Times, which ran an editorial Monday urging California voters to reject the measure. (Neal Broverman, The Advocate)

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Rus
    Date posted: 2008-11-08 3:01 PM
    Hometown: Porltand Oregon

    Comment:

    Google's statement was pure politics and with no substance. Because if it was real there would be money behind it. And if they said they were a YES on Prop 8 the Liberal media would have a hay day on negative spin. So they give lip service to the liberals... I don't blame them, and since they didn't give any money it's clear they don't believe in gays getting married just like the rest of the decent people in California. It's time to move on and realize that Gays have enough rights. (Actually more because of the free insurance) than the rest of the world... People are sick of gays getting MORE than non Gays and it's clear by this vote... We voted that Marrige in between a man and a woman in Oregon and I'm glad people had enough sense to stop this Minority dictating the majority.


  • Name: Leon
    Date posted: 2008-10-31 10:34 AM
    Hometown: San Diego

    Comment:

    I am not either for or against same sex marriage and not a bible thumper and I do not go to church, but I still believe that when we die that is the only time we should be judged, not by someone that thinks there way is the only way. We do not have the right to judge anyone.


  • Name: Marc
    Date posted: 2008-10-24 3:37 AM
    Hometown: Portland, OR

    Comment:

    You people who base your entire argument on the notion of homosexuality being somehow "abnormal" or "unnatural" because it "does not exist in the animal world" are uninformed. Bruce Bagemihl, Ph.D., published the definitive reference book on homosexuality in nature in his 1999 book "Biological Exuberance". In his review of a hundred of years of notes and research projects by biologists from around the world, covering over 450 different species, he found that, not only is homosexuality and bisexuality unexceptional and common in the animal kingdom, it is the de-facto "lifestyle" standard in many of the species genetically closest to our own. So if this imaginary fact of a heterosexual animal world forms the cornerstone of your beliefs, you'd do well to find a better fact. The straightforward admission of your hatred, fear and prejudice would probably suit your arguments better as you can at least avoid looking completely foolish by misrepresenting well-known facts and observations.


  • Name: Harriet
    Date posted: 2008-10-24 2:50 AM
    Hometown: Kennewick

    Comment:

    I am bitterly disappointed that Google would take a stand against the time-honored, and generation proven marriage between a man and a woman-- PERIOD!!! Gays have rights like heterosexuals, but traditional marriage with husband, wife, and children is the FUNDAMENTAL unit of society. For this unit to be replaced will bring upon our nation and world calamities which have never before been seen in the world's history. Gay marriage is NOT a replacement, substitute, or in any way a mirror image of the traditional marriage. True happiness in family life can only be achieved by sustained respect, reverence, and adherence to principles found only in the traditional marriage. I'm bitterly disappointed that google has taken a stand. I've lost my respect for this search engine, and will look elsewhere for my gateway to the internet. Harriet


  • Name: Susan
    Date posted: 2008-10-23 2:23 PM
    Hometown: Denver, CO

    Comment:

    Okay, Maybe this is the reason why I can't find news reports on Google of the vicious personal attacks on those promoting Prop 8. Guess I'll try another search engine. Too bad you took sides, Google. Will I ever be able to trust you again?


  • Name: Linda
    Date posted: 2008-10-23 4:33 AM
    Hometown: Santee

    Comment:

    Honestly, I've been bisexual and been in the gay scene and I still vote yes on Prop 8. Why? because I am a mom now, and although it is fine that gay people want to be accepted more, children who are innocent need not be exposed to the idea of same-sex marriage. They are so easily influenced and absorb things like a sponge, I don't think it is fair to kids to have to know about that from an early age. In the bible there was Adam and Eve not Adam and Adam. 'Course, I just started reading the bible and was never religious to begin with. There are those who decide that same-sex is the way for them. Gay, staight, we are all human, but what is natural to us as humans is our role in procreation. Animals procreate; rarely are there gay animals, and if there were, they wouldn't be flaunting it. A man and woman are supposed to make children, which is why we are here. Anything else is companionship and lust. Being gay is a choice, but it is not the most natural of choices.


  • Name: Bruce Fairbanks
    Date posted: 2008-09-30 10:02 PM
    Hometown: Sacramento, CA

    Comment:

    There could be LOTS of celebrities who've donated to the No On 8 campaign. Maybe some of them just don't make a big deal about it by sending out a press release.


  • Name: Kevin
    Date posted: 2008-09-30 6:02 PM
    Hometown: West Hollywood

    Comment:

    Ellen has made millions in show business but there has been NO news reported regarding a substantial donations like the contributions from Brad Pitt and Steven Spielberg. What a shame she has not open her pocket book. The same goes for all the other gay celebrities. TSK TSK TSK.


  • Name: Fr. Doug Johnson
    Date posted: 2008-09-30 3:34 PM
    Hometown: Sioux Falls, SD

    Comment:

    Yes, Ellen would be appalled, if only to learn she is "our most dangerously worshiped leader". She might find it funny, too. Anyway, Stephen, how does one worship dangerously? And do you know she hasn't contributed any financial support? And how do you know?


  • Name: Yvonne
    Date posted: 2008-09-30 1:50 PM
    Hometown: Berkeley

    Comment:

    Ellen actually has voiced her opinion about Pro.8. I believe she stated NO on 8 during her show. don't know if she's contributed with money but won't be surprised if she did already or will do so soon. have YOU contributed?? what only Ellen can because she's rich and famous?!??!!?


  • Name: Stephen
    Date posted: 2008-09-30 11:02 AM
    Hometown: Cambridge

    Comment:

    Now if Ellen, our most revered, if not dangerously worshiped leader would make some sort of effort to help No on 8. She sold her wedding photos for millions, but has yet to contribute a dime or voice of support. I'm appalled.


  • Name: janet
    Date posted: 2008-09-29 8:22 PM
    Hometown: San Francisco

    Comment:

    We appreciate Googles verbal support. Now we would like to appreciate Googles financial support! To Google company co-founder Sergey Brin, will YOU make a generous donation to NO on Prop.8?


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
    Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.
  • The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
    With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.
  • Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
    After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.
  • The Pride of Antwerp
    Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.
  • Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
    In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.
  • Top Political Blogs
    From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.
  • The Diva of French Television
    A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.
  • He Asked for It
    Gay playwright Erik Patterson tackles HIV in a funny way -- no hospital beds here.