California attorney general Jerry Brown urged the state supreme court to review legal challenges to Proposition 8, according to his statement on Monday. Brown said that the court's ruling was necessary to ensure that all state agencies are cohesive in enforcing laws and policies.
"There is
significant public interest in prompt resolution of the
legality of Proposition 8," said Deputy Attorney General
Mark Benington in a statement. The supreme
court could choose to issue a stay on Prop. 8, thus halting
its enforcement until the court rules on the
ballot measure's constitutionality. Unless a stay
or a ruling is handed down, Prop. 8 is legal and gay
couples have no legal right to marriage in the
state.
Lower courts typically hear cases before the supreme court agrees whether to review them, but petitioners have asked the state's highest court to directly accept the review, in order to promptly resolve the issue.
Brown told the San Francisco Chronicle in August that if Prop. 8 were to pass, he believed that same-sex marriages performed before its passage would be found valid by the courts. (Michelle Garcia, The Advocate)
These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.
If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above.
All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.
See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.
Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.