Continental promo
||  News  ||
 
November 19, 2008

Vermont Senator to Introduce Marriage Bill

Vermont state senator John Campbell said Tuesday he will introduce a bill to legalize gay marriage when the legislature returns in January, the Associated Press reports.

Gay and lesbian couples have had civil union rights in Vermont since 2000. A commission of legislative leaders formed in April to discuss whether the state should allow same-sex couples to marry. Though the panel concluded that instituting same-sex marriage would be positive for the state, it stopped short of suggesting that the state grant same-sex marriage. Recommending gay marriage "would undercut the purpose and usefulness of [the commission's] work and [the] report," the April 21 report said.

Campbell, the senate majority leader, said that the bill wouldn't likely go far unless it were supported by Gov. Jim Douglas, a Republican. Douglas recently beat out Democratic challenger Gaye Symington to retain his position. (Michelle Garcia, The Advocate)

Keywords:  marriage 
Related stories from Advocate.com

Reader Comments

These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site. They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling. The viewpoints appearing here are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or views of advocate.com, The Advocate, or its affiliates.

  • Name: Nat
    Date posted: 2008-11-20 5:45 PM
    Hometown: Vermont

    Comment:

    It's official-we have had a response from the Newt Gingrich/James Dobson school of citizen's rights A woman called and threatened to blow up Senator John Campbell's house


  • Name: Ken Bourne
    Date posted: 2008-11-20 11:15 AM
    Hometown: Loksbergen, Belgium

    Comment:

    Look People, lets just make it easy and follow the European model. ALL couples, straight or gay, must go to the local City Hall to be married. Generally referred to as Civil Marriage. IF you want a church wedding or to have your vows "sanctified" by some person in a religious ceremony, you can do that. But for the government the only marriage that counts is the one in City Hall...if you get married in a church without going to City Hall it doesn't count for the government. There problem solved...no problem with existing code of laws where there are references to marriage or spouse. All people are treated equally under the law. I know from first hand knowledge as my husband and I have been legally married for 5 years in Belgium and until US Immigration law changes I cannot bring him back to the USA as my spouse because of DOMA, so I live in exile from my homeland.


  • Name: Joey O
    Date posted: 2008-11-19 9:57 PM
    Hometown: newark, NJ

    Comment:

    Pam, I agree with you but think if it was to be like that, it needs to take another step. Let religious groups have marriage, and have the word struck from US Law. Every couple, hetero or homosexual, would, in the eyes of the law, be in a civil union. Being married could have a religious meaning to the couple, but, in the eyes of the law, would mean nothing. Let religious people keep their term, and give the LGBT community true equality!


  • Name: Eric P.
    Date posted: 2008-11-19 6:34 PM
    Hometown: Pasadena

    Comment:

    Jeff, excellent point! And now that I'm thinking about it, why didn't our community start doing that sooner? Good call! I'm not a gay citizen - I am a citizen. I don't pay gay taxes - I pay taxes. I don't want gay equality - I want equality!


  • Name: dave befford
    Date posted: 2008-11-19 6:33 PM
    Hometown: chester,mass.

    Comment:

    the religious term for marriage is the sacrament of Holy Matriamony. marriage is a civil term and that is what we seek in all 50 states. whether or not any particular church whiches to perform a sacramental rite upon a same sex couple is of no concern.


  • Name: kaa
    Date posted: 2008-11-19 6:27 PM
    Hometown: ky

    Comment:

    Pam, marriage is more than just a religious institution. New Jersey adopted civil unions, believing and declaring that couples joined in civil unions would have all the rights of married couples. It hasn't worked out that way. For example, there have been problems with medical insurance and other employee benefits. Separate but equal is never equal.


  • Name: Rich
    Date posted: 2008-11-19 6:23 PM
    Hometown: San Diego

    Comment:

    Pam: Marriage is not a religious ceremony; it is a state law (you may feel that it is religious, but the fight for marriage equality is for "equality under the law"). You get a license from the state, not a religious group; you do not have to involve anything religious to complete the process of getting married; you do not have to belong to or believe in any religion. Religious rituals such as baptism do not involve the state, so yes they are religious and can be limited to whomever the particular religion wants. Creating a "civil-union" law, or any other name, could be done so long as it is implemented in the law for everyone equally. This would require the changing of every law that has any link to marriage, in every state and in the federal codes. The CA Supreme Court considered whether a separate system should be used besides marriage, for everyone, but ruled that was not in the interest of the people.


  • Name: tj
    Date posted: 2008-11-19 4:10 PM
    Hometown: wyoming

    Comment:

    Pam, it took me awhile over past few years to figure that out (assuming it was only about the word). It's about SO being innate, love being personal, the mandatory social role that "we the people" give TO civil govt in the US, and freedom among religious expression. One civil (state, govt) marriage law for all citizens, equally. I lived in a small western frontier county of 23,000 with 60 separate churches mostly "christian". No one or several should dictate marriage outside their boundary (freedom of individual choice to affiliate/ marry their way), and certainly not to the federal civil govt of USAll.


  • Name: Michael
    Date posted: 2008-11-19 3:54 PM
    Hometown: Voorhees, NJ

    Comment:

    Thoughtful and pertinent post, Jeff !!! Why is marriage being denied to some U.S. citizens when others are not questioned or challenged. We all pay taxes .... where is the equality ??


  • Name: Pam
    Date posted: 2008-11-19 3:41 PM
    Hometown: Coopersville, MI

    Comment:

    Why, why why do we have to have "marriage?" Can't we have civil unions, and get the same benefits? A "marriage" is a religious ceremony, based on biblical principles. Hets get pissed about it because of the religious connotations of it all! Let's take it out of the equation, and get the same rights!!


  • Name: Rod Wright
    Date posted: 2008-11-19 3:39 PM
    Hometown: CDA, ID

    Comment:

    Dear Jeff, that is the most intelligent thought I have heard for weeks. I invite You to write more comments? Sincerely, Rod, CDA, ID.


  • Name: Jeff
    Date posted: 2008-11-19 1:19 PM
    Hometown: Los Angeles

    Comment:

    Can we, in our own community, stop referring to "gay" marriage? What we seek is the right to marry. If we continue to use adjectives among ourselves, how can we expect the mainstream to view us as equals.


Back to top

Submit a comment for this story:

*Type your comment here (Required, 1000 characters max. HTML formatting and hyperlinks are NOT permitted.):

*Name (Required): 

*Hometown (Required): 

*E-mail address: (Required, but will not be displayed)

Is this comment for publication? 
Yes   No

Daytime phone number: (Required for print publication only and will not be displayed)

Please enter the words you see in the box, in order and separated by a space. Doing so helps prevent automated programs from abusing this service.

  

If you would like to submit a comment for posting, please fill out the form above. 

All comments submitted via this form are subject to posting or publication. (To send a private letter to an Advocate editor or writer, please use the e-mail button at the top of the page, or use snail mail.) If you would like your comment considered for publication in The Advocate magazine, please include your full name, your city of residence, and a phone number where you can be reached during business hours so that we can confirm your identity. Your e-mail address and telephone number are strictly confidential and will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to contact you about your comment.

See the Contact page for sending comments for reasons other than responding to Advocate editorial and news stories.

Please note that comments sent by fax or snail mail are unlikely to be posted, although they will be considered for publication along with all letters received via e-mail or via this Web page. Comments that chiefly concern Advocate.com content will be considered for posting only on the Web site. The Advocate reserves the right to edit submitted comments for grammar, spelling, obscenities, or libel; we will, however, do our best to preserve the original comment's style and intent. Comments considered for publication in The Advocate magazine may also be edited for length.

More Exclusives
  • View From the Hill: The End of DADT?
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed that lawyers are exploring ways to ease enforcement of the military's gay ban, but cautioned that the law doesn't leave much wiggle room. He need look no further than DOD history for a lesson in altering the policy.
  • Hot Sheet: Week of July 5
    When you get back from that big 4th of July barbecue, unwind with Sacha Baron Cohen's Bruno and your favorite B-movie-mocking, basic cable robots.
  • Hungry Like the Wolf
    A master of viola, ukulele, piano, and harp, Patrick Wolf is a music prodigy -- one who, the night before this interview, spit on a cop and got himself arrested.
  • Soapside: Advocate's Guide to Daytime
    Forbes March talks about playing gay, Otalia fans outraged, update on One Life to Live’s Patricia Maurceri’s firing over gay plot point, Phillip Chancellor III big reveal, and Erica Kane goes to Africa.
  • The Faces of Federal Prop. 8
    With the federal challenge to Prop. 8 moving full speed ahead, Advocate.com sits down with the two couples named as plaintiffs in the suit.
  • Mommy, the Gays Are Coming
    After a year of advancements and celebration for gay and lesbian Colombians, the community takes to the streets of Bogota for the country's biggest pride ever.
  • The Pride of Antwerp
    Advocate.com hits the gay-friendly streets of Antwerp with openly gay police commissioner Serge Muyters.
  • Excerpt: Mean Little Deaf Queer
    In an excerpt from her humorous and harrowing new memoir, Mean Little Deaf Queer, Terry Galloway recalls her early childhood, describing feelings of ugliness, confusion about gender, and being one of the boys.
  • Top Political Blogs
    From Joe.My.God to The Daily Beast, Advocate.com spotlights a few of the best blogs that cover politics, inside and way outside the Beltway.
  • The Diva of French Television
    A hot young screenwriter who has made gay OK for millions of French viewers, Nicolas Mercier sips champagne, dons a feathered hat, and says he wants to see Colin Farrell and Jude Law go at it.