BY Andrew Harmon
August 05 2009 12:00 AM ET
The Uniting American Families Act -- a gay-specific proposal originally introduced in 2000 under a different name by New York representative Jerrold Nadler -- is part of Hondaâ€™s more expansive bill, known as the Reuniting Families Act. UAFAâ€™s centerpiece is a new federal classification for same-sex relationships known as â€śpermanent partners.â€ť The criteria for that status range from the concrete (individuals must be 18 years or older and cannot be married to another person) to the complex (they must be â€śfinancially interdependentâ€ť and â€śintend a lifelong commitmentâ€ť). Applicants would be required to â€śproveâ€ť their relationship with ample documentation, such as joint bank account statements, leases, mortgages, and adoption papers for any children dependent on both individuals. The process likely would be more rigorous for gay couples than for straight married couples seeking the same immigration rights, sources predict. â€śApply any test you want,â€ť Matthew says of the regulations. â€śWe would pass every one of them.â€ť
Immigration Equalityâ€™s lobbying strategy has worked so far, primarily because the organization focused extensively on building bridges with mainstream immigration groups and faith-based organizations, Ralls says. â€śFor the first time, groups like the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the American Immigration Lawyers Association, and faith communities such as the Presbyterians, Episcopalians, Methodists, and others have come together in support of including LGBT families in a critical piece of larger legislation,â€ť he says. â€śItâ€™s an important lesson for the LGBT movement. If you can build coalitions outside of the community and work with those coalitions for inclusions in larger efforts, victory is possible.â€ť
Not everyone is on board, of course. Conservative think tanks and influential religious organizations like the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops quickly denounced Hondaâ€™s bill as a poison pill for substantive reform.
The arguments against gay inclusion in an immigration omnibus bill are hardly surprising. Rampant sham relationships would overwhelm the system, critics argue. They also assert that any federal recognition of same-sex relationships is in violation of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, thus undermining traditional marriage. That argument makes Honda bristle. â€śIâ€™m not expanding marriage rights,â€ť he says. â€śBut I am cognizant of the rights of partners in committed relationships. All citizens should be afforded the same legal right to apply for a visa for their partner.â€ť
Backroom deals and last-minute trade-offs are the currency of Congress, and gay immigration rights are not exempt from such treatment. Supporters, however, point to several promising factors. Leahy, the Senate sponsor of UAFA, is chairman of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee. Charles Schumer -- who is New Yorkâ€™s senior senator, a tenacious deal-maker, and chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Refugees, and Border Security -- is supportive of Leahyâ€™s bill and is pushing for a comprehensive Senate bill to be crafted by Labor Day. â€śThis is Leahyâ€™s baby, and heâ€™ll fight for it. Schumer knows that,â€ť says one insider.
The Obama administration also has recently indicated support for UAFA: â€śThe president thinks Americans with partners from other countries should not be faced with a painful choice between staying with their partner or staying in their country,â€ť White House director of specialty media Shin Inouye says in a statement.
Matthew has had to live with that choice for more than two decades. â€śBut Iâ€™m hopeful,â€ť he says, â€śand that hope sustains [us] until one day when we can go home.â€ť
- The Miseducation of Destin Holmes
- WATCH: President Obama Tells Morehouse Grads 'Be the Best Husband to Your Boyfriend'
- WATCH: Ben Affleck and SNL Crew Go to Ex-Gay Camp
- Florida Teen Facing Sex Offender Charge For Consensual Same-Sex Relationship
- WATCH: The Cure for Gay Wedding-Related Depression
- Op-ed: Religion Shouldn't Be an Excuse for Discrimination
Sign Up For Email Updates
- Commentary Op-ed: Religion Shouldn't Be an Excuse for Discrimination 1 hour 56 min ago
- Current Issue The Miseducation of Destin Holmes 2 hours 36 min ago
- Politics Obama to Grads: 'Be the Best Husband to Your Boyfriend' May 20 2013 7:56 PM
- Crime Thousands Rally Against Anti-LGBT Violence in NYC May 20 2013 7:35 PM
- Women WATCH: Ellen Responds To Abercrombie's Sizeist CEO - 'Fitch, Please!' May 20 2013 7:26 PM
- Marriage Equality WATCH: Matthew Morrison Can't Even Make Sense of Marriage Inequality May 20 2013 7:00 PM
- Law Texas Man Resurrects Suit Alleging AG Fired Him for Being Gay May 20 2013 6:48 PM