Voices
CONTACTStaffCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2024 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
Editor's note: In a February 7 column, the San Francisco Chronicle reported on "the biggest open secret in the landmark trial over same-sex marriage": that U.S. district judge Vaughn R. Walker, who is presiding over the federal lawsuit challenging California's Proposition 8, is gay. Erwin Chemerinsky, a top constitutional law scholar and founding dean of the University of California, Irvine, School of Law, discusses the ramifications of the outing, and what effect -- if any -- it has on the case.
Judges constantly decide cases that might personally affect them or their family members. Female judges of reproductive age are allowed to decide cases involving the availability of abortion. Catholic judges can hear challenges to abortion laws even if their church threatens to deny them communion if they support abortion rights. Judges who are also parents can hear challenges to affirmative action programs even if they have children who might benefit or be hurt by the eventual decision.
The list of situations in which a judge's life might be affected by the decision is endless. This is insufficient by itself to challenge a judge's hearing of a case or an ultimate decision.
Judge Walker's sexual orientation has no relevance to his hearing the case challenging Proposition 8, the California initiative that amended the state's constitution to ban same-sex marriage. No one knows what Walker's views are regarding marriage equality. He was appointed to the bench by President George H.W. Bush. Overall, he has the reputation of being a conservative, though perhaps libertarian, judge. A position cannot be inferred from his sexual orientation, even assuming the rumors about it are true. Many gays and lesbians reject the institution of marriage, and there is no way to know what, if anything, Walker thinks on the issue before him as to whether Prop. 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.
And even if his views were known, that doesn't require his disqualification. Everyone knows how Justice Antonin Scalia or Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will vote when the Supreme Court is next asked to overrule Roe v. Wade. Yet no one would ever suggest that this requires their recusal. Judges inevitably have views on the issues that will come before them. In fact, as a lawyer, I'd always much rather know the judge's views and try to tailor my arguments to persuade him or her than pretend that the judge has no positions.
Obviously, there are circumstances where judges must be disqualified.
The rules concerning judicial ethics specify many such instances. For
example, if a judge or a member of the judge's family has a financial
interest that would be affected by the case -- no matter how small -- then
disqualification is required. Likewise, a judge cannot participate in a
case if the judge or a family member is involved in the litigation. But
the mere fact that a judge conceivably might be affected, or that a
judge has views on the issue, isn't sufficient for disqualification or
for criticizing the judge for hearing the matter.
Indeed, to
listen to the supporters of Prop. 8, everyone in society is affected by
marriage equality, regardless of sexual orientation. A central argument
against allowing gays and lesbians to marry has been that it will harm
the institution of marriage. This seems a silly argument, but it
certainly means that there is no judge who would be unaffected by the
constitutionality of Prop. 8.
Ultimately, the ninth circuit court of appeals, and perhaps the U.S. Supreme Court, will have to decide
whether Prop. 8 violates the U.S. Constitution. Judge Walker, as the
district court judge, is playing a key role in developing the record and
in issuing the initial ruling. I am hopeful that he will do the right
thing and conclude that gays and lesbians have the same right to express
love and commitment, the same right to gain the legal benefits of
marriage, the same right to experience the joys and disappointments of
marriage as heterosexual men and women always have had. But whatever
his ruling, his sexual orientation is a private matter and irrelevant to
his hearing the case.
Want more breaking equality news & trending entertainment stories?
Check out our NEW 24/7 streaming service: the Advocate Channel!
Download the Advocate Channel App for your mobile phone and your favorite streaming device!
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
Here Are Our 2024 Election Predictions. Will They Come True?
November 07 2023 1:46 PM
Meet all 37 of the queer women in this season's WNBA
April 17 2024 11:24 AM
17 Celebs Who Are Out & Proud of Their Trans & Nonbinary Kids
November 30 2023 10:41 AM
Here Are the 15 Most LGBTQ-Friendly Cities in the U.S.
November 01 2023 5:09 PM
Which State Is the Queerest? These Are the States With the Most LGBTQ+ People
December 11 2023 10:00 AM
These 27 Senate Hearing Room Gay Sex Jokes Are Truly Exquisite
December 17 2023 3:33 PM
10 Cheeky and Homoerotic Photos From Bob Mizer's Nude Films
November 18 2023 10:05 PM
42 Flaming Hot Photos From 2024's Australian Firefighters Calendar
November 10 2023 6:08 PM
These Are the 5 States With the Smallest Percentage of LGBTQ+ People
December 13 2023 9:15 AM
Here are the 15 gayest travel destinations in the world: report
March 26 2024 9:23 AM
Watch Now: Advocate Channel
Trending Stories & News
For more news and videos on advocatechannel.com, click here.
Trending Stories & News
For more news and videos on advocatechannel.com, click here.
Latest Stories
Iraq postpones vote on bill punishing gay sex with death
April 20 2024 1:31 PM
Russian poetry contest bans entries from transgender poets
April 20 2024 1:25 PM
Here's who won 'RuPaul's Drag Race' season 16
April 20 2024 1:01 PM
The Tip Off: A beginners guide to the WNBA
April 20 2024 11:06 AM
John Fetterman challenges Pa. school board’s cancellation of talk by gay actor
April 19 2024 2:39 PM
New study finds inadequate response to mpox outbreak
April 19 2024 2:06 PM
Fighting back against MAGA’s attacks on equality
April 19 2024 1:00 PM
Just one Christian Nationalist group is behind Idaho's bans on trans care and abortion
April 19 2024 11:57 AM
Linda Perry opens up in new documentary, premiering in June at Tribeca Festival
April 19 2024 11:43 AM
Trans woman loses lower legs in NYC subway attack. Now, friends rally to help her
April 19 2024 10:06 AM
Black trans woman África Parrilla García shot to death in Puerto Rico
April 18 2024 4:55 PM
Marjorie Taylor Greene has sunk so low even Fox News can't stand her anymore
April 18 2024 4:04 PM
Single lesbians are avoided by straight women, but not straight men. Here's why.
April 18 2024 3:18 PM
The LGBTQ+ movie fan's guide to the 2024 TCM Classic Film Festival
April 18 2024 2:44 PM