Just a Case of "Lawyerly Ego"?

Last week, political strategist Chad Griffin said a move by three LGBT groups to intervene in his group's efforts to overturn Prop. 8 at the federal level would "undermine" the case. Now the leader of one of those groups says the accusation is "baffling."

BY Andrew Gumbel

July 13 2009 11:00 PM ET

Kendell insisted, however, that the public fallout -- she called it a "little dust-up" -- between the three groups and the Olson-Boies team was just a manifestation of lawyerly ego and natural competitiveness, and that all sides would end up working harmoniously together. "We've all been in the middle of conversations where we have disagreed and then gone on to fight shoulder to shoulder as brothers and sisters, completely united," she said. "And I have no reason to think that that won't be the case in this litigation. This is a disagreement among friends."

She chose her words very carefully when asked why NCLR, Lambda, and the ACLU chose to go against the express wishes of the Boies-Olson team rather than trying to hammer out a compromise behind the scenes. "We made clear our intention to intervene, particularly given the nature of the record that the court desired," she said. "Counsel for plaintiffs indicated they were leaning toward opposing the motion and we essentially, as sometimes happens on this particular point, agreed to disagree."

The intervenors' motion says, among other things, that the lawsuit as it stands has the "potential" to fail to protect the interests of certain LGBT rights groups. Kendell insisted, however, that this did not mean she did not have confidence in the abilities of Olson and Boies to litigate the case in federal court.

"I want to be absolutely clear about that," she said. "We have nothing but respect… for Ted Olson and for David Boies. Our argument is a very simple one… The judge in this case made very clear that he wishes to develop a factual record on virtually every key issue that has been a stumbling block to winning marriage equality, and our three organizations have litigated every single one of those issues in one forum or another.

"That experience will be invaluable and indeed, we believe, essential in developing a kind of record that is most likely to assure victory as the case inevitably goes up on appeal."

NCLR and the other groups made clear they did not support the idea of a federal lawsuit before it was filed, and Kendell made a point of mentioning that NCLR was not told about it ahead of time. All now say, however, that they want to be a part of it -- whether the Boies-Olson team is happy about their participation or not.

James Essex, a lawyer with the ACLU, told Advocate.com: "While there have been differences of opinion in the past whether to jump into this particular pool, we are all in it now. Whether we are in this lawsuit or not, this lawsuit is going to decide the issue for all [our] members, and for every LGBT person in the country… Once we are all in it, I can't see any reason to think why any of these organizations would want this to fail. We want it to succeed."

Tags: Politics

AddThis

READER COMMENTS ()

Quantcast